Taylor Swift’s lawyers have responded to a lawsuit from a former Las Vegas showgirl who owns the trademark to “Confessions of a Showgirl,” claiming that the suggestion anyone would confuse the brand with Swift’s 2025 album The Life of a Showgirl is “absurd.”
In March, Maren Wade, whose real name is Maren Flagg, filed the lawsuit in California, alleging trademark infringement, false designation and unfair competition.
She is seeking unspecified damages from Swift and UMG Recordings and a court order that would bar the pop star from continuing to use the album title.
In response to an injunction that would have immediately stopped Swift from using her album title, Swift’s lawyer filed a response, which has been seen by Variety and reads:“This motion, just like Maren Flagg’s lawsuit, should never have been filed. It is simply Ms. Flagg’s latest attempt to use Taylor Swift’s name and intellectual property to prop up her brand.”
It continues: “Plaintiff attempts to broadly lump her cabaret show and defendants’ musical album together as ‘entertainment services.’ That comparison is absurd.”
Swift’s lawyers go on to argue that the former showgirl has herself been attempting to link the two brands, writing: “Since the album announcement, plaintiff has reframed her brand around the album, flooding her social media accounts with posts attempting to align herself with Ms. Swift and the album.”
They continue: “Prior to the album announcement, plaintiff had never used ‘the life of a showgirl’ in her social media promotion. Following the announcement, plaintiff used the phrase or posted generally about Ms. Swift or the album over 40 times on her branded Instagram and TikTok accounts.”
Wade sang on America’s Got Talent in 2014, the same year she started writing a column in the Las Vegas Weekly titled “Confessions of a Showgirl.” The column featured Wade’s reflections on her experiences as a Vegas showgirl, and she has since grown the brand into a podcast and live musical show. According to the filing, Wade’s trademark covers live stage performances, theatrical productions and television.
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 30-day free trial. Terms apply.
ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 30-day free trial. Terms apply.
ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.
In her original filing, Wade’s lawyers stated that when Swift applied to register The Life of a Showgirl as her own trademark, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office declined because it ruled that it was confusingly similar to Wade’s existing trademark.
Their decision hinged on the phrase “of a Showgirl,” and found that the fact that both trademarks would refer to musical and theatrical performances would be likely to cause consumers to mistakenly believe the two brands are connected.
In the initial lawsuit, Wade accused Swift of ignoring her trademark and states that her brand has been undermined as despite the fact that she has been using the name since 2014, many now believe that she has copied the singer’s album title. The filing states: “The continued erosion of that mark threatens the entirety of” Wade’s brand.
The Independent has approached Swift and Wade for comment.