Latest Posts

We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson

We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson


The narrator introduces herself in the first paragraph, and by the end of it you already know you cannot trust a word she says. Her name is Mary Katherine Blackwood. She is eighteen. She believes that with a little more luck she might have been born a werewolf, since the two middle fingers on each of her hands are the same length. And she is fond of her sister Constance, of Richard Plantagenet, and of the death cap mushroom. Everyone else in her family, she mentions, is dead. We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson has one of the most famous openings in American fiction, and it earns that reputation by doing everything at once: it is funny, it is sinister, and it tells you the shape of the whole book while appearing to tell you nothing.

The premise is laid out within the first chapters. Six years ago, arsenic in the sugar bowl killed four members of the Blackwood family at dinner. Constance, who cooked the meal and took no sugar on her blackberries, was tried and acquitted. She has not gone past her own garden since. Merricat, who had been sent to bed without supper that night, now does the shopping twice a week, while a frail uncle in a wheelchair turns the poisoning into an endless manuscript. The village has never forgiven any of them.

Two Sisters Who Have Always Lived in the Castle

At heart the book is a love story, and a deeply strange one. Merricat worships her sister. As a child she drew Constance as a fairy princess, pink and white and golden, and was surprised that the pictures came out true. Constance cooks, gardens, mends and soothes. Merricat guards. Everything that matters in the novel passes between these two women in a kitchen at the back of a house whose front is kept turned, blank and shuttered, toward the road.

Merricat’s method of guarding is magic, and Jackson makes it oddly persuasive. Every Wednesday she walks the wire fence. On Sundays she checks her safeguards: a box of silver dollars buried by the creek, a doll buried in the long field, her father’s notebook nailed to a pine tree. She chooses three words of protection and decides that, so long as nobody says them aloud, no change can come. She eats the first one, written in apricot jam on her toast. Then the notebook falls from its tree, and a cousin she has never met walks up the drive in the rain.

What lifts We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson above a clever gothic puzzle is that Constance plays along. She calls her sister silly, she smiles at the omens, and she never once asks her to stop. Their exchanges are tender and, read a second time, almost unbearable. Jackson knew a great deal about fear of the world beyond the door (she suffered from agoraphobia herself in her later years), and the novel treats Constance’s retreat with neither pity nor diagnosis. It is simply the shape her life has taken.

The Village at the Gate

The counter-thread is the village, and it is where the book draws real blood. Merricat’s trips to town are written as a board game: the library is the start, the black rock by her gate is home, and every obstacle in between costs her turns. Men loaf on the bench outside the general store, and boys at a fence chant a rhyme about poisoned tea. In a café, a man named Jim Donell sits beside her and asks, over and over, when the Blackwoods are moving away, because he is the kind of man who has one joke and squeezes it dry.

Merricat answers this with fantasies of the whole village writhing on the floor while she steps over them to fetch groceries. Here is the genius of We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson. Her hatred is monstrous, and the village’s cruelty is real, and the novel refuses to let either cancel the other. You flinch from her and you take her side in the same sentence. When the outside world finally comes up the drive in force, the scene is one of the most frightening in mid-century fiction precisely because nothing supernatural happens in it at all.

Where We Have Always Lived in the Castle Gives Ground

Very little, but not nothing.

  • Cousin Charles is one-note. The intruder exists to want money. He asks about the safe, he wears the dead father’s things, he bullies the uncle, and he never gets a private thought. He is a perfect irritant and a thin character.
  • The central secret is guessable. Jackson plants it carefully, and many readers will have it worked out long before We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson says it plainly. Anyone reading it as a mystery should know that.

Read These Next

If you came here looking for more Halloween classics, our hub has the full shelf. These are the closest companions to We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson.

  1. The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson, her other great house, this time with something in it that may not be human.
  2. Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh, for a young woman’s sour, funny, unsettling first-person voice in a cold small town.
  3. What Moves the Dead by T. Kingfisher, for a decaying family seat and a sister bound to it.
  4. The Secret History by Donna Tartt, for a narrator who reveals the crime early and the people late.

About Shirley Jackson and Some Castle Trivia

Shirley Jackson was born in San Francisco in 1916 and became notorious in 1948, when “The Lottery” appeared in The New Yorker and readers wrote in by the hundreds, many of them furious (we have a close reading of The Lottery if you want to revisit it). She wrote six novels, two comic memoirs of family life including Life Among the Savages, and more than two hundred short stories. Hill House came out in 1959; three years later this book followed, and it proved to be the last novel she finished.

  • Viking Press published it on 21 September 1962.
  • It carries a dedication to Pascal Covici, the Viking editor better known for his long partnership with John Steinbeck.
  • Time magazine named it among the ten best novels of 1962.
  • Hugh Wheeler adapted it for Broadway in 1966; the production at the Ethel Barrymore Theatre closed within a week.
  • A 2018 film directed by Stacie Passon cast Taissa Farmiga as Merricat, Alexandra Daddario as Constance, Crispin Glover as Uncle Julian and Sebastian Stan as Charles.
  • In 2002, Book magazine ranked Merricat seventy-first on its list of the best fictional characters since 1900.

The Verdict

Jackson does in barely two hundred pages what most gothic novels cannot manage in six hundred: she builds a house, a family, a village and a crime, and then lets one damaged voice tell you all of it slantwise. We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson is often shelved as horror, and it is horrifying, but it is also a sharp comedy of manners and one of the strangest love stories in American fiction. Read We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson once for the dread, and again to see how carefully the trap was laid.

Then check that your own gate is locked.

Content notes tap to reveal

The arsenic poisoning of a family, in the past, discussed at length.Small-town persecution and children taunting an outsider.Fire, crowd violence and vandalism.Illness and death in old age.Mockery of a disabled, incontinent old man.A narrator’s violent revenge fantasies, sometimes played for comedy.



Source link

The four best kettlebell moves for beginners who want to build full-body strength

The four best kettlebell moves for beginners who want to build full-body strength


After working with a personal training client for a while, I like to introduce a new challenge in the form of kettlebells.

These weights are great for building full-body strength and the uneven weight distribution provides new stimulus for muscles in your forearms and around your wrists.



Source link

Wordle today: The answer and hints for October 17, 2026

Wordle today: The answer and hints for October 17, 2026


Today’s Wordle answer should be easy to solve if you tend to slip up.

If you just want to be told today’s word, you can jump to the bottom of this article for today’s Wordle solution revealed. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

SEE ALSO:

Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable

SEE ALSO:

NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for October 17, 2026

Where did Wordle come from?

Originally created by engineer Josh Wardle as a gift for his partner, Wordle rapidly spread to become an international phenomenon, with thousands of people around the globe playing every day. Alternate Wordle versions created by fans also sprang up, including battle royale Squabble, music identification game Heardle, and variations like Dordle and Quordle that make you guess multiple words at once. 

Wordle eventually became so popular that it was purchased by the New York Times, and TikTok creators even livestream themselves playing.

What’s the best Wordle starting word?

The best Wordle starting word is the one that speaks to you. But if you prefer to be strategic in your approach, we have a few ideas to help you pick a word that might help you find the solution faster. One tip is to select a word that includes at least two different vowels, plus some common consonants like S, T, R, or N.

What happened to the Wordle archive?

The entire archive of past Wordle puzzles was originally available for anyone to enjoy whenever they felt like it, but it was later taken down, with the website’s creator stating it was done at the request of the New York Times. However, the New York Times then rolled out its own Wordle Archive, available only to NYT Games subscribers.

Is Wordle getting harder?

It might feel like Wordle is getting harder, but it actually isn’t any more difficult than when it first began. You can turn on Wordle‘s Hard Mode if you’re after more of a challenge, though.

Here’s a subtle hint for today’s Wordle answer:

Blunder.

Does today’s Wordle answer have a double letter?

The letter F appears twice.

Want more tech and digital culture news delivered to your inbox daily or sent straight to your device? Sign up for Mashable’s Top Stories newsletter or get Mashable push alerts today.

Today’s Wordle is a 5-letter word that starts with…

Today’s Wordle starts with the letter G.

The Wordle answer today is…

Get your last guesses in now, because it’s your final chance to solve today’s Wordle before we reveal the solution.

Drumroll please!

The solution to today’s Wordle is…

GAFFE

Don’t feel down if you didn’t manage to guess it this time. There will be a new Wordle for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we’ll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

Reporting by Chance Townsend, Caitlin Welsh, Sam Haysom, Amanda Yeo, Shannon Connellan, Cecily Mauran, Mike Pearl, and Adam Rosenberg contributed to this article.

Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today

If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Wordle.



Source link

Jacob Elordi Thought He Was Insane Until He Saw a John Cassavetes Film

Jacob Elordi Thought He Was Insane Until He Saw a John Cassavetes Film


Jacob Elordi thought he was going crazy until he saw a classic John Cassavetes film.

“I probably made three movies that I thought were pretty bad when I was young, and I had hopes and dreams of being this kind of terrific, ferocious stage actor. So I was pretty not fond of myself at that time,” explained the Australian actor during an event presented by Cartier Cinema Club at Santa Monica’s Aero Theatre on Friday. “And I watched this movie and it was one of the first times that I saw the creative process of an actor sort of fleshed out in detail. The movie made me feel a lot less insane and alone.”

It proved to be such a pivotal experience in his creative life that Elordi handpicked that film — 1977’s Opening Night starring Gena Rowlands as a renowned actress teetering on the edge of a breakdown as she inches closer towards big Broadway opening night — for Friday’s screening, which marked the first stateside Cartier Cinema Club event after the initiative’s launch last month at the Venice Film Festival. The luxury house created the initiative to honor the spirit of cinema while paying tribute to artists who make big-screen work. Cartier ambassador Elordi not only selected the film, he sat for a 30-minute discussion about it alongside Oscar-winning filmmaker Sean Baker and moderator Kim Gordon.

Like Rowlands’ character, Myrtle Gordon, Elordi thought he, too, “was having some form of mental breakdown.” But he was able to exhale once he saw how the storyline played out. Rowlands stars alongside Cassavetes, Ben Gazzara, Joan Blondell, Paul Stewart, Zohra Lampert and others.

“This movie showed me that what was actually happening was hopefully the artistic process, the process of creating to a character. You can’t just learn the lines and say the lines. It showed me all the stuff that was going on inside that I thought was sort of my body and mind breaking down [but] was actually a part of the acting process,” explained the Oscar nominated Frankenstein star.

Elordi revealed that he watched Opening Night last week in preparation for today’s event, and he had some similar thoughts to those from his first watch, notably because he’s about to start another new movie shortly that has thrown him for a loop. (Though he didn’t name the project, he’s due to start shooting Ari Aster’s Scapegoat alongside Scarlett Johansson, Jude Law, Ella Purnell and Caleb Landry Jones.)

“I’m getting ready to do a movie now and I’ve been kind of throwing myself on the floor and wondering, should I just drink a lot of vodka? Or should I smash a window? What do I need to do to get to this point?” he wondered aloud. “And me re-watching the film now after making over 10 movies or something like that, again, it invited me back into the creative process and what it means. You can be searching for a character and not know that you’re searching for it. It starts happening in your toes and your knees and your chest. And that’s why I picked this movie because it always makes me feel less crazy and more like I’m actually a part of a process of filmmaking that’s been happening for a long time.”

Gordon, a screenwriter known for work on Nightmare Alley, directed by her partner Guillermo del Toro, then asked Elordi if that’s because he’s so absorbed by Rowlands performance. He is and was. “Yeah. I mean the amount of times that I just want to throw myself on the floor and cry and scream and tell the director to go fuck themselves and just drink and drink and drink. It makes me feel a lot less alone as an actor.”

That said, Elordi drew laughs when he said that he had no clue how Rowlands’ pulled off any of her scenes on the big screen, particularly the ones where she was really throwing herself around and acting under the influence. “I don’t know how you do that and not look like a ham because everything she does is so big and so expressive, but it’s all completely contained in truth inside her. I’ve watched that scene so many times. You can spin around in circles until you’re dizzy, you can get drunk, you can do all kinds of things, but I don’t know how she does that. I don’t know how she does anything. She’s a genius.”

Baker then weighed on on Cassavetes’ filmography and how inspired he is by the entirety of his work.

“You get asked often as an independent filmmaker, ‘What is your favorite Cassavetes?’ And it really depends on the day because, first off, they’re all masterpieces. They deal with very personal, universal issues and struggles that we all go through. So it really depends on where you are in your life,” he explained. “It’s where I am in my life and that’s how I gravitates towards a certain title. I said Husbands back in the day because I think that was my guy film. Then when I started exploring genre cinema, I was more drawn towards The Killing of a Chinese Bookie.”

Later, when he started working more with actors and honing his craft as a filmmaker, Baker then leaned more toward A Woman Under the Influence and Opening Night, he said. “I can go on forever about him. He’s basically the godfather of U.S. indie cinema and had really just in many ways I think showed us how to do it.”

Morgan closed the conversation by asking both Elordi and Baker if they take inspiration from the many risks Cassavetes took throughout his career.

“I think all artists should take risks,” said the Anora auteur in answering first. “Obviously he did throughout his entire career, which may be hurt in the moment. He was always ahead of his time, but it also proves one very important thing — that cream rises. We’re here 50 years later talking about this film and celebrating this film? That proves that taking risks, staying true to your own, not compromising, and making art that’s a little unsafe is worth it.”

Baker’s words generated an enthusiastic round of applause.

“[Cassavetes] said something like, ‘I’d love to be part of the studio system and have my rent paid and my family good, but I just can’t do it. I’d love to, but I just can’t do it.’ And that’s my favorite thing about these movies. There was no other story he could have told. It made him too ferocious and angry or upset. There was no other way that he could have made movies,” Elordi added in closing. “In movies now, we need a lot of that. Something that you can’t deny, something that you have to do, no matter if it sends you broke, hungry, tired, jobless, you’ve got to make that movie that you have to make. And that’s exactly what we do.”





Source link

Ben Affleck makes surprising Jennifer Lopez confession two years after their divorce

Ben Affleck makes surprising Jennifer Lopez confession two years after their divorce


Ben Affleck has made a surprising confession about his ex-wife Jennifer Lopez two years after their high-profile split.

The Oscar-winning actor, 54, had nothing but praise for Jennifer, 57, as he reflected on their relationship and the lessons he learned from watching her navigate the entertainment industry.

Speaking on The Moment with Jorge and Paola Ramos podcast, Ben described his former wife as “probably the hardest-working person that I’ve ever known”, admitting that even he was left astonished by her dedication.

ben affleck frowning© Getty Images
Ben holds ex-wife Jennifer Lopez in high regard

The Gone Girl star explained that Jennifer had faced significant challenges throughout her career, particularly as a Latina woman trying to establish herself in Hollywood.

He praised her determination to break down barriers and prove her critics wrong, describing her as a pioneer who had achieved things others told her were impossible.

Ben also acknowledged the additional scrutiny Jennifer has faced throughout her career, suggesting she has had to work considerably harder than many of her contemporaries to achieve the same recognition.

Animals cast at LA premiere of new Netflix show© Getty
Ben with Kerry Washington and the cast of Animals, a new Netflix crime drama

“I hold her in enormous, enormous, respect and regard,” he said, before going on to explain that Jennifer’s unwavering belief in herself, even when others doubted her abilities, was something he deeply admired.

The actor also reflected on how much he had learned from his time with Jennifer and her family, making it clear that their marriage had left a lasting impression on him.

“She’s pretty extraordinary,” he said, adding that he wished her continued success.

Jennifer Lopez© Instagram
Ben says Jennifer Lopez is the hardest working person he has ever met

Ben’s comments come nearly two years after Jennifer filed for divorce in August 2024, bringing their much-publicized second chance at love to an end.

The former couple famously began dating in 2002 after meeting on the set of Gigli. They became engaged later that year but called off their wedding before separating in 2004.

Almost two decades later, they rekindled their romance in 2021 and delighted fans when they tied the knot in Las Vegas in July 2022, followed by a lavish ceremony at Ben’s Georgia estate the following month.

The former pair share three children© Getty Images
Ben co-parents his three children with former wife Jennifer Garner

However, their fairytale reunion was short-lived. Jennifer listed their date of separation as April 26, 2024, when she filed for divorce four months later. Their divorce was finalized in early 2025.

Earlier this month, Ben once again praised Jennifer’s talents during an interview with Variety, suggesting that her work had not always received the awards recognition it deserved.



Source link

New compounds target clumping enzyme to protect brain cells in Alzheimer’s models

New compounds target clumping enzyme to protect brain cells in Alzheimer’s models



Researchers have identified a specific enzyme that clumps up and damages cellular powerhouses in the brains of mice with Alzheimer’s disease. Developing chemical compounds to prevent or eliminate these clumps slowed memory loss and brain cell death in the animals. The findings were published in Cell Reports Medicine.

Alzheimer’s disease involves the buildup of misfolded proteins in the brain, most notably beta-amyloid plaques and tau tangles. These proteins interfere with brain cell function and eventually lead to memory loss and cognitive decline.

A lesser-known player in cell survival is an enzyme called G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, or GRK2. In healthy cells, this enzyme usually operates in the main fluid of the cell, where it helps regulate cellular communication and stress responses.

When modified by a specific chemical tag in a process called phosphorylation, GRK2 changes its behavior. It can migrate to mitochondria, the microscopic structures that generate energy for cells.

A research team led by Joshua Abd Alla and Ursula Quitterer at ETH Zurich in Switzerland investigated whether abnormal regulation of this enzyme contributes to the brain damage seen in Alzheimer’s disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a major feature of the condition, and the researchers suspected that modified GRK2 might be interfering with these cellular powerhouses.

The team first examined the brain tissue of genetically modified mice that develop Alzheimer’s-like symptoms. They looked specifically at older mice that already exhibited heavy beta-amyloid buildup.

They found that a massive portion of the GRK2 in these mice had clumped together into large, dysfunctional aggregates. These clumps were highly concentrated on the mitochondria within the brain cells of the animals.

When the researchers looked at brain tissue samples from a small study of four human patients with dementia likely caused by Alzheimer’s, they observed the exact same pattern of clumped GRK2. In both the mice and the human samples, the accumulation of this enzyme was accompanied by mitochondrial dysfunction and elevated oxidative stress.

The researchers noted that the presence of beta-amyloid and toxic tau proteins actually triggered the initial phosphorylation and clumping of GRK2 in laboratory models. This suggests a destructive cycle where Alzheimer’s hallmark proteins damage mitochondria by causing GRK2 to clump, which in turn accelerates the buildup of more Alzheimer’s proteins.

To understand how the clumped enzyme causes damage, the researchers analyzed which other proteins it bound to in the mouse brains. They discovered that it attached to a protein called TOMM6, which normally helps transport materials across the outer membrane of mitochondria.

The researchers then tested the chemical interaction between GRK2 and TOMM6 in laboratory dishes. They observed that active, healthy GRK2 typically adds a chemical tag to TOMM6, keeping it stable and functional.

The clumped, modified version of GRK2 found in the diseased brains was inactive and failed to modify TOMM6. Without this chemical tag, TOMM6 also began to clump up and lose its ability to interact with the mitochondrial pores.

The scientists next bred new strains of mice to genetically force different versions of the GRK2 enzyme into their brains. When they introduced an inactive, clumping version of GRK2, the mice developed severe mitochondrial damage, rapid beta-amyloid accumulation, and died at an accelerated rate.

Conversely, breeding mice to produce extra active, healthy GRK2 protected the animals against these symptoms and improved their survival. In another genetic test, the researchers engineered mice to produce extra TOMM6 to compensate for the amount lost to clumping.

While extra TOMM6 reduced the large plaques of beta-amyloid, it unexpectedly caused a different, soluble form of beta-amyloid to build up. This soluble buildup was highly toxic to the brain cells, leading to an increased mortality rate in the animals.

Because simply adding TOMM6 was harmful, the team tried a pharmacological approach to fix the root of the problem. They developed a small chemical compound called CPD10, designed to stabilize GRK2 and prevent it from adopting the harmful, clumping shape.

Using computer modeling, the researchers found that CPD10 preferentially attaches to the healthy, unphosphorylated form of GRK2. By binding to this active form, the compound shifts the cellular balance, making it much harder for the enzyme to become phosphorylated and clump together.

They administered this compound to aging Alzheimer’s mice over a six-month period. The compound successfully penetrated the brain and prevented the enzyme from clumping on the mitochondria.

The mice treated with CPD10 had healthier mitochondria, fewer beta-amyloid plaques, less toxic tau protein, and experienced less brain cell loss than untreated mice. Behavioral tests in a water maze showed that the treated mice also retained better spatial memory.

The researchers explored a second chemical strategy aimed at removing the existing clumps rather than preventing new ones. They synthesized another molecule, CPD57, designed to boost the activity of the proteasome, which acts as the garbage disposal system of the cell.

Cells naturally use the proteasome to break down damaged or unnecessary proteins, preventing toxic buildups. The CPD57 compound physically binds to the opening of this disposal system, acting like a gate opener to let more waste inside.

They treated older Alzheimer’s mice with this compound for 14 days and evaluated their brain tissue. The compound increased the cellular garbage disposal activity and successfully degraded the clumped GRK2 and TOMM6 proteins.

When given over a six-month period, this molecule also slowed the accumulation of beta-amyloid plaques and reduced signs of cellular aging. The findings demonstrate that targeting these protein clumps from multiple pharmacological angles can offer neurological protection in animal models.

While these chemical compounds showed promising results in mice, animal models of Alzheimer’s disease do not perfectly replicate the human condition. The human tissue analysis in this study relied on a very limited number of brain samples obtained during surgery for brain tumors.

Because these samples were taken during active operations rather than after death, they provided a rare snapshot of the living brain’s chemistry, but the sample size was inherently small. Larger studies involving more human patients are necessary to confirm how widespread this specific enzyme clumping is in the general population.

It remains an open question whether the clumped enzyme on the mitochondria is the primary driver of the brain damage, or if the overall lack of healthy, active GRK2 floating elsewhere in the cell is the real culprit. Future research using organisms entirely deficient in GRK2 will help pinpoint the exact mechanism behind the cellular deterioration.

Extensive safety and efficacy testing will be required before either of the newly developed chemical compounds can be considered for human clinical trials. These findings provide a new pharmacological avenue to protect the aging brain.

The study, “Analysis of GRK2 aggregation in the pathology of Alzheimer disease in animal models,” was authored by Joshua Abd Alla, Alexander Perhal, Xuebin Fu, Andreas Langer, Yasser el Faramawy, and Ursula Quitterer.



Source link

5 Tender Phrases Wives Who Think The World Of Their Husbands Say Casually

5 Tender Phrases Wives Who Think The World Of Their Husbands Say Casually


Men need compliments, too, yet most men were more likely than not raised in ways that left them fairly compliment-starved. Think about it: It’s easy to imagine a woman complimenting another woman. It’s also easy to imagine a man complimenting a woman. 

But when we do an honest audit of the TV and movies we consume, and of the day-to-day interactions that we witness and engage in, women (or men) genuinely complimenting men is more the exception than the rule. These five phrases will melt your husband’s heart, and wives who think the world of their husbands instinctively know how to use them.

Wives who think highly of their husbands often say a few tender phrases:

1. ‘You are so attractive’

iona didishvili | Shutterstock

While women get the lion’s share of conditioning about their physical appearance mattering a lot, that doesn’t mean that they’re the only ones who like to be acknowledged for their body/appearance/more superficial traits. Men benefit from body and appearance-based compliments just as much. 

Not so sure? Try saying a few of the following (whichever you most believe/feel about your unique man) and watch him light up like a Christmas tree:

  • “You are so handsome.”
  • “You have the most beautiful eyes.”
  • “You have such a kind smile.”
  • “I love your hair.”
  • “You are so attractive.”
  • “I love the way you smell.”
  • “I love that outfit on you!”
  • “You are the best natural-smelling man in the whole world.”
  • “I love your face so much.”
  • “You have the biggest hands.”
  • “Your arms are looking extra big lately!”
  • “Wow, you weren’t kidding when you said you had been working out. Look at you!”

RELATED: If A Man Truly Loves You From The Depths Of His Soul, He Will Say These 4 Things On A Regular Basis

2. ‘I chose a good man’

wife who still think the world of their husband saying i believe in you Dmytro Zinkevych | Shutterstock

Life can feel like a never-ending gauntlet of challenges for a man who’s up for big things. Compliments that tell him you believe in him can go a long way toward filling his love cup.  Whether your man is in an especially daunting season of difficulties or not, try a few of the following and notice how he responds.

  • “I believe in you so much.”
  • “It is so easy to believe in you.”
  • “I chose a good man.”
  • “I never doubt you for a second.”
  • “I know that you can do this.”
  • “You’ve done hard things before and persevered. You’ll make it through this, too.”
  • “I love watching you show up in life with so much courage. It is so easy to be your cheerleader.”

RELATED: 10 Tiny Things Men Secretly Want Most From Women, According To Psychology

3. ‘You’re doing a great job’

wife who still think the world of their husband saying you're doing a great job Roman Samborskyi | Shutterstock

In terms of love languages, many men default to acts of service as their primary way of showing love to their significant others. For example, taking out the trash, doing small home repairs, and doing the dishes after dinner’s done. 

While it’s easy to take acts of service for granted (after all, they are just part of adult life), it’s always nice to have our partners acknowledge our efforts. And you don’t just have to compliment his domestic service. You can praise him for the effort you see him deploying in any area of his life. Try some of the following and see if he responds especially strongly to any of them:

  • “Thank you for taking out the garbage. I appreciate it.”
  • “Thank you for fixing the squeaky door! I feel grateful and relieved every time I use it, and it no longer makes a sound.”
  • “You have been putting in a lot of extra time at work lately. Thank you for providing so well for us.”
  • “Thank you for doing the dishes, my love. It is really helpful.”
  • “I love watching you work.”
  • “You are so good to me. I couldn’t have asked for a better boyfriend/husband/partner.”
  • “I love seeing you play with the kids. I can tell how much they love wrestling with you.”
  • “Thank you for mowing the lawn. It feels so much better out there now.”
  • “This was such a lovely date. Thank you for organizing this for us. I feel very loved.”

RELATED: 9 Phrases Women Use On A Regular Basis That Attract Genuinely Decent Men

4. ‘I’m so proud to be your wife’

wife who still think the world of their husband saying i have such respect for you Dmytro Zinkevych | Shutterstock

Many women have heard that men prefer to feel respected over loved. I say: why not both? Love him up by acknowledging how much you love and respect him. Try on some of the following for size:

  • “I’m so proud to be your wife/girlfriend/partner.”
  • “You’re such a good man.”
  • “I have so much respect for the way that you move through the world.”
  • “It took a lot of courage to admit that you were wrong/apologize/have that tough conversation back there… I admire that you were able to do that. It was very attractive.”
  • “I love how considerate you are with my friends/parents/co-workers. You are so aware of other people, and I appreciate it.”

RELATED: Women With High Mental & Emotional Integrity Usually Say 7 Phrases In Casual Conversation

5. ‘I’m on your side’

wife who still think the world of their husband saying i would follow you anywhere stockfour | Shutterstock

Let him know that you see him and that you trust his way of being in the world by saying a few of the following:

  • “I trust you.”
  • “I would follow you anywhere.”
  • “I’m on your team.”
  • “You’ve never steered us wrong in the past.”
  • “I’m on your side.”
  • “I don’t mind where we go for dinner tonight. Whatever you think is best.”

Iterate, calibrate, and make them your own. Remember, these compliments aren’t just ego-stroking; they should come only from genuine love and appreciation for your partner.  Don’t feel like you need to exaggerate or lay it on overly thick. Instead, find the perfect compliment that makes sense and feels genuine to you in your relationship.

If you and your partner haven’t been praise-oriented over the years, start slowly by introducing these compliments bit by bit. It’s better to introduce it in a drip-feed way than to go from 0 to 100 overnight and make it feel out of character. Often, men who are doing a great job don’t even feel like they’re doing a good job, so these compliments can be more valuable than you know to make your partner feel seen and loved in your relationship.

RELATED: 12 Everyday Things Men Find Totally Romantic — And Wish Women Would Do More

Jordan Gray is a five-time #1 Amazon best-selling author, public speaker, and relationship coach with more than a decade of experience. His work has been featured in The New York Times, BBC, Forbes, The Huffington Post, and more.



Source link

All the news about the iPhone Duo

All the news about the iPhone Duo


“The pre-order demand for iPhone Duo, our first foldable iPhone, has been nothing short of extraordinary. We are working hard to get this revolutionary new product into customers’ hands as quickly as possible, and we will continue accepting orders online,” the company said in a statement.

“Our teams look forward to welcoming customers at Apple Stores worldwide to experience the iPhone Duo and the incredible full iPhone line-up for themselves,” it added, without disclosing whether inventory would be available for customers who were unable to secure pre-orders when the device goes on sale Oct. 23.



Source link

Steve Vladeck’s “Hard Questions About Court Expansion”

Steve Vladeck’s “Hard Questions About Court Expansion”


Cartoon criticizing Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1937 court-packing plan. (NA)

 

Georgetown law Professor Steve Vladeck is one of the leading critics of the conservative majority on the Supreme Court. But in an insightful recent post on his substack, he outlines key reasons why “court expansion” is a bad response to its flaws. The cure is likely to be worse than the disease:

[I]t seems to me that those who are fully onboard the expansion-or-bust train should have to do more than simply assert that having four new Democratic appointees on the Court in 2029 would be a self-evidently “good” thing. If nothing else, proponents of expansion should have to answer the following four questions:

  1. How do we avoid touching off a race to the bottom, where each time one party controls the House, Senate, and presidency, it expands the Court to ensure an ideologically and politically sympathetic majority?
  2. If a race to the bottom is unavoidable, how do we avoid further (and potentially fatal) erosion of public confidence in the Court—which will quite transparently be little more than a lever of power for whichever party last had such a trifecta?
  3. If eroding public confidence in the Court is a feature, and not a bug, how do we insulate against the same erosion of public confidence in lower federal courts?
  4. What is the case for why expansion is a better way to achieve the desired reforms than alternatives that would (or, at least, should) avoid many of these forward-looking concerns?

He adds that court-packing could easily “permanently undermine judicial review as an institution.” The rest of his piece (which is behind a paywall) offers far from reassuring answers to these questions.

I have offered similar criticisms of court-packing in a long series of articles and blog posts, most recently in a June Lawfare article  where I explained (among other things) why the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais doesn’t justify packing, and in a July UnPopulist article critiquing a court-packing proposal advanced by Andy Craig. In these pieces, I explain why the Court’s record of checking dangerous abuses of government power – though not without serious flaws – is considerably better than many critics claim. In addition, I argue that court-packing is likely to undermine effective judicial review – not only by the Supreme Court, but also by lower courts.

Like Vladeck, I think some of the issues that concern critics of the Court can be more effectively addressed in other ways. For example, in the Lawfare article, I explain how Congress can fix the flaws of the Callais decision by banning or restricting gerrymandering. It could also enact a binding ethics code for the justices. Justice Alito was wrong to suggest otherwise, back in 2023. That said, if your main goal is a sweeping reversal of much of the Court’s recent jurisprudence, there may be no easy way to achieve that quickly without court-packing or something like it. I would argue that any benefits that might achieve are outweighed by the enormous costs of destroying judicial review.

In addition, if your objection to the Court’s recent decisions is that they often don’t do enough to constrain unconstitutional actions by other branches of government or by the states, court-packing is likely to make that problem worse, not better. Destroying judicial review won’t enforce tighter constitutional constraints on the executive or bring back Roe v. Wade. To the contrary, it would largely destroy any hope of doing so.

In another recent piece, I assessed “non-packing” rationales for increasing the size of the Supreme Court. There, I argue that these rationales are mostly weak; and, to the extent they have merit, there are better ways to address them than an expansion that amounts to court-packing. I even outline possible ways to increase the size of the Court without creating an opportunity for court-packing (this would require allowing the party that doesn’t hold the White House to pick some of the new justices).



Source link

New large-sized telescope array in Spain ushers in a new era in exploring the extreme universe

New large-sized telescope array in Spain ushers in a new era in exploring the extreme universe


  • Four 23-meter telescopes on La Palma mark the completion of construction for CTAO-North’s Large-Sized Telescope sub-array.
  • Their large mirrors and rapid response are designed to capture faint atmospheric flashes from energetic cosmic sources.
  • Commissioning and formal acceptance remain ahead, while the first telescope has already produced scientific results.

A brief flash high above a mountain can carry evidence of an explosion billions of years ago. Catching that faint signal requires enormous mirrors, fast cameras and the ability to turn toward a changing sky. Four telescopes on La Palma are bringing that combination to a new stage of development.

The milestone completes construction of the four instruments, but does not mean the entire observatory has begun full operations. Technical testing, commissioning and formal acceptance remain necessary. Three new telescopes join LST-1, a prototype that has already demonstrated its scientific value during commissioning.

Reading gamma rays through the atmosphere

The telescopes do not capture cosmic gamma rays directly at ground level. When a high-energy gamma ray enters Earth’s atmosphere, it creates a cascade of secondary particles. Those particles produce a faint flash of Cherenkov light that the mirrors collect and focus onto a camera.

Researchers use those images to infer the original gamma ray’s direction and energy. The atmosphere therefore becomes part of the detection system, rather than simply an obstacle between the telescope and space. The cameras must record a fleeting optical signal instead of making a conventional photograph of a distant object.

Lower-energy gamma rays generate less Cherenkov light, making large collecting areas particularly important. The LSTs are designed to give CTAO sensitivity from approximately 20 gigaelectronvolts to around 3 teraelectronvolts. In that context, “low energy” means the lower end of ground-based gamma-ray astronomy, rather than weak radiation by everyday standards.

Each parabolic reflector provides roughly 400 square meters of reflecting surface. Its camera uses 1,855 photomultiplier tubes to convert arriving light into electrical signals. Together, the optics and electronics allow the instruments to investigate sources too faint or short-lived for less sensitive observations.

Four viewpoints sharpen the picture

LST-1 has operated as a single telescope while the other three instruments were being built. Adding LST-2, LST-3 and LST-4 changes how researchers can observe an atmospheric particle shower. Several telescopes can record the same event from different positions on the ground.

When gamma rays from the universe enter Earth’s atmosphere, they produce particle showers. These trigger very brief flashes of blue light that last only fractions of a second. The CTAO telescopes can detect this Cherenkov radiation. (CREDIT: Pekic / CTAO)

Combining those views helps reconstruct where the shower developed and which direction its initiating gamma ray came from. It also improves estimates of energy and the separation of gamma-ray events from unwanted backgrounds. The collaboration expects substantially better sensitivity and angular resolution than a single instrument can provide.

Speed matters alongside precision. Each telescope stands about 45 meters tall and weighs approximately 100 tonnes, yet can reposition across the sky within 20 seconds. That agility helps it respond when another instrument announces a sudden cosmic event.

Gamma-ray bursts are particularly demanding targets because their brightness can change rapidly. Delayed observations may miss the most informative phase. Rapid movement and a low energy threshold therefore address two different problems: getting to the source quickly and collecting its faintest accessible gamma-ray signal.

The prototype has already delivered results

The first LST was inaugurated in 2018 and began astronomical observations during commissioning in 2019. Its published performance assessment used observations of the Crab Nebula and its pulsar, familiar reference sources in gamma-ray astronomy. The work showed that the prototype reached its expected performance under the conditions studied.

That assessment also illustrates why an instrument’s advertised energy threshold needs context. Researchers estimated a threshold around 20 GeV when events triggered the instrument, rising to approximately 30 GeV after analysis. Useful scientific performance depends on event selection and observing conditions, alongside the telescope’s design.

The CTAO will cover a very wide energy range and provide excellent angular resolution and sensitivity in comparison to any existing gamma-ray detector. With its ability to detect energies between 20 GeV and 300 TeV and its unprecedented resolution, the CTAO will be able to observe further than ever before and push the CTAO to the edge of the known electromagnetic spectrum, providing a completely new view of the sky. (CREDIT: CTAO)

More distant targets have demonstrated its reach. LST-1 detected very-high-energy emission from the quasar OP 313 during a bright flare in December 2023. Subsequent work, published in Astronomy & Astrophysics in 2026, combined observations with the nearby MAGIC telescopes to investigate the source and its emission.

OP 313 has a redshift of 0.997, and the detected radiation traveled for roughly eight billion years. Those observations provide a demonstrated example of the prototype’s ability to investigate distant activity. They also offer a foundation for the more ambitious observations planned with the complete LST sub-array.

Why a lower threshold opens a deeper view

Distance creates a particular difficulty for gamma-ray astronomy. High-energy gamma rays can interact with background light between galaxies and be absorbed before reaching Earth. The effect increasingly limits which distant sources remain observable at very high energies.

Access to lower energies helps astronomers work around that barrier. The LST collaboration hopes to detect sufficiently bright gamma-ray bursts at redshifts around four. Such sources would probe an era roughly 12 billion years ago, when the universe was less than two billion years old.

That reach is a scientific goal, rather than a guaranteed distance limit or a completed observation. Success will depend on a burst’s brightness, spectrum, timing and visibility from La Palma. It would nevertheless extend studies of energetic explosions into a much earlier period of cosmic history.

The LST sub-array at CTAO-North at the “Roque de los Muchachos” Observatory on La Palma. (CREDIT: Beedron Record / CTAO/LST)

Other targets include supermassive black holes, neutron stars and environments that accelerate cosmic particles. The wider observatory will also search for possible signals associated with dark matter. Those searches test hypotheses about unseen matter rather than assuming that a detectable gamma-ray signature must exist.

Commissioning comes before routine observations

The next stage is to verify the instruments and integrate them into CTAO operations. The observatory’s central organization must formally accept the telescopes after the required technical work. Their inauguration marks progress toward that process rather than its completion.

The four LSTs are also only one part of the planned observatory. CTAO envisages more than 60 telescopes across northern and southern sites, with the southern array in Chile’s Atacama Desert. Different telescope sizes will cover complementary portions of its planned 20 GeV–300 TeV range.

The project intends to operate through observing proposals and provide public access to high-level scientific data and software. That approach will allow researchers beyond the construction collaborations to pursue their own questions. For now, the immediate task is to turn four completed instruments into a calibrated array that can reliably distinguish cosmic signals from the atmosphere’s fleeting flashes.

Dig deeper into ground-based gamma-ray astronomy

These resources explain the instrument design, demonstrated performance and science behind the new array.






Source link