Review

What Are The YA Bestsellers So Far in 2026–and What Do They Say About The State of YA?

What Are The YA Bestsellers So Far in 2026–and What Do They Say About The State of YA?


It’s been several years since I’ve done a deep dive into the YA books landing on The New York Times bestseller list. The last time was in 2023, where I looked at the titles on the list over the 10 years of the list’s existence. But as we enter into the middle of 2026 and begin talking about the best YA of the year so far, as well as what we might expect to see in the second half of the year, it felt worthwhile to check in with The New York Times lists.

As has been the case for several years now, there are three lists where YA books show up in The New York Times. There’s the weekly list that focuses on hardcover best sellers. Then there’s the monthly paperback bestsellers list which, as the name suggests, publishes the bestselling YA paperbacks over the last month. The final list is the series list, which combines children’s and YA books; books end up on this list once there are three titles within a given series (for example, A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder would land on the series list, combining sales of all the titles within it; Queen of Faces, the first in a new series, would be on the YA hardcover list, as there is only one book in the series so far). There is, of course, also the graphic novels and comics bestseller list, which can include YA titles.

So what makes a book a “bestseller,” per the New York Times? This remains the question of the ages. General interest bookstores nationwide that are part of the team whose sales comprise the list report those sales to the paper weekly. This isn’t all bookstores everywhere in the U.S. It’s selective, and no, no one really knows which bookstores they are or the whole landscape of those bookstores.

Per The New York Times‘s own methodology notes:

The book selling universe is comprised of well-established vendors as well as emerging ones. The sales venues for print books include national, regional and local chains representing tens of thousands of storefronts; many hundreds of independent book retailers; scores of online and multimedia entertainment retailers; supermarkets, university, gift and big-box department stores; and newsstands.

For the purpose of ease and clarity, the data I perused for this piece are limited to the two easiest to track lists: the weekly YA hardcover list and the monthly YA paperback list. The titles on each of these lists were pulled from their first January editions until their final June editions.

In 2026 so far, the bestsellers list for YA titles has been, in a word, boring. It’s been quite white, and the same titles have dominated the list all year long. We’ll see new titles pop on, but it took quite a while for those new titles to emerge this year. Indeed, perhaps the thing that’s stood out about this year’s bestsellers in YA is how predictable it is, as well as how many of the titles on the hardcover bestseller list are the same titles on the paperback list.

This raises a few questions and concerns about the state of YA more broadly:

  • If the same titles are landing on the bestsellers list week after week, is it because there are just fewer books being sold, so those that are selling are already more likely to land there? In other words, is it harder now for a new author or new book from a midlist author to see high enough sales to make the list, even if the sales of those on the list are themselves not particularly high?
  • The above’s final question is worth considering, given that there is regular crossover of the bestselling titles in both formats. Certainly, we know books by Laura Nowlin and Lynn Painter are selling. But are they really selling that many copies in both formats to consistently be landing on both lists? Or are other books simply not selling? Are the sales numbers for YA such that it doesn’t take that many sales to land on either or both lists?
  • Who is purchasing YA books right now? Of note, library sales do not typically count toward these lists (they would if the library is purchasing from a reporting bookstore, but most libraries purchase their titles through a vendor who provides a discount). Many of these titles are those which tick older in their target audience–think ages 14+ or 16+, instead of 12+. Many also fall into the romance or the romantasy category. Are those making book purchases the adults buying and reading these same genres that are published for adults? Though data has not been updated in a long time, this was well-documented during the era of Twilight. There is nothing wrong with adults buying or reading YA books. It does, however, skew the data on what books young adults are actually reading and buying. It also plays a big role in why YA feels like it’s in its messy adolescence, sometimes forgetting to appeal to the whole range of teen years, rather than those closest to adulthood. That there are entire states seeking to rebrand YA books as adult books in their public libraries–spreading an inaccurate message about who and what these books are for–doesn’t help.
  • Related to the above question is the question of where these books are selling. Not every community has an independent bookstore, nor a big name store like Barnes & Noble. But many do have a Walmart, Target, or similar big box store with a book section. Adult readers purchasing their next romance or romantasy read may not even know they’re buying a young adult novel because so many of the covers for young adult and adult novels now look the same.
  • What role are special editions of these books playing? If all sales are counted together, if there are more options for design, there’s more chance for the item to sell. Those pretty book covers and page designs are only going to help sell the book, if they aren’t also doing the work of selling multiple editions of the book.
  • Most of the books showing up on the bestsellers list have been there for a long time. New titles that emerge are coming from the above-named genres or are from YA authors with name recognition–especially from adults. Sarah Dessen has been writing YA for 30 years, and while she certainly still appeals to teen readers, most of those who are familiar with her and her work are well into adulthood now.
  • It’s interesting to see how different the bestselling YA titles are from the titles that have been recognized as among the strongest, most critically-acclaimed ones this year (see the second half of this piece). Although this isn’t uncommon, the divergence this year really stands out. That’s especially true when thinking about how few books published in 2026 are even getting a chance on either list.
  • The diversity on this list leaves a lot to be desired. This directly reflects both the efforts to get these books onto the radars of readers and six years of direct attacks on literature through book banning. Is it clear yet that not everyone is running out to buy banned books once they’re banned? The books just disappear, and we see imprints that publish them shut down. We Need Diverse Books offers even more insight into the challenges that voices from the global majority are having right now in even getting published.

So what’s been topping the list? First, let’s look at the two New York Times YA Bestseller lists separately. Here is the breakdown of the books that have dominated the hardcover list. This is based on the 26 weeks of lists since the start of the year, and note that some of these titles made their debut on this list before 2026 (so they’ve likely been on the list longer than 26 weeks):

Now to the monthly YA paperback bestsellers list. This one covers a total of six lists, and like with the hardcover note above, some of these books have been on the paperback bestseller list since before the start of the year. The count here is only for 2026.

No other title appeared more than two times on the YA paperback bestseller list.

As you’ll likely notice, there’s a lot of crossover between the hardcover and paperback bestsellers. Lynn Painter and Laura Nowlin dominate both. Painter has three books between the two lists (two of which have been on both lists), and Nowlin has two books, with one that has been on each list. All six months of 2026, Painter and Nowlin have had at least one book on list; Painter has had two books on both lists every week and month this year.

They aren’t alone, though.

The Book Thief spent time on both the hardcover list and the paperback list this year. It sat on the paperback list for four months (February, April, May, and June) and it appeared on the hardcover list for five weeks (March 29, then April 5, 12, 19, and 26). A 20th anniversary special edition hardcover of the book released in March this year.

If there are 320 “spaces” on the bestseller list at six months into the year–260 weekly and 60 monthly–then between the spaces taken up by Painter’s titles (58) and those taken up by Nowlin (38), that’s two authors making up 27% of all the possible spaces for bestsellers.

None of this is an indictment of those authors nor those books. Rather, it’s meant to reflect the questions we should be considering about YA right now more broadly, as outlined above. There are so many new books published every single week. Why do two have so much dominance on the (secretive) lists of record?

Why is it there is only one author of color showing up at the top of these lists this year? While there are other authors of color who’ve hit the list this year in respectable numbers–You’ve Found Oliver by Dustin Thao was on the hardcover list for seven weeks and Storm Breaker by Nisha J. Tuli, three weeks–the vast majority who make the list make it for just one week–Behind Five Willows by June Hur, The Dragon and the Sun Lotus by Amélie Wen Zhao, Eternal Ruin by Tigest Girma, I Could Give You The Moon by Ann Liang, The Swan’s Daughter by Roshani Chokshi–or, if they’re lucky, two weeks–The Secret World of Briar Rose by Cindy Pham and Young World by Soman Chainani. The Heirs by Faridah Àbíké-Íyímídé has spend the last two weeks of this data period on the list, and it’s possible that title will continue forward.

Even fewer authors of color crack the monthly paperback list.

If it feels like the world of YA literature has been odd recently, you’re probably not wrong. It’s not unusual for a few titles to be popular for a long period of time, but it is unusual for so few authors to dominate for so long.

All of this data is just that, of course, but with the perspective of the history of YA, as well as the current context of the category, there’s a lot of questions to be asking–and, perhaps, a reminder to continue advocating for a more inclusive array of titles to be promoted and championed more broadly. It’s also a reminder of what we lose as book bans continue to rage unabated: access to an array of voices and perspectives for all readers.





Source link