A new partnership between WSP and pro aqua brings a groundbreaking, durable PFAS water treatment solution by eliminating contaminants on site.
WSP’s electro-oxidation PFAS water treatment system, known as PFASER, is uniquely effective for eliminating persistent water contaminants at the source.
The water treatment unit (patent pending) exclusively incorporates pro aqua’s best-in-class commercial boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode reactors, giving it a competitive edge for efficiency, longevity and operational costs.
A durable, modular and cost-effective solution
PFASER is grounded in WSP’s longstanding leadership in addressing the impacts of PFAS, and the development of an electro-oxidation process with BDD electrodes by WSP’s Senior Water Treatment Engineer, Dr Valérie Léveillé.
Over several years of research and development that included extensive lab testing and two pilot projects, WSP’s scientists confirmed pro aqua’s BDD electrodes as a superior choice for PFAS elimination.
Pairing efficiency and longevity, these electrodes have already proven their ability to operate continuously for over six years and are expected to last for many more years.
PFAS water treatment plant meets stringent international standards
PFASER also offers another competitive advantage: it is the first commercially available water treatment unit that removes perchlorate, an unwanted byproduct of the electro-oxidation process.
WSP’s proprietary perchlorate removal process, in combination with pro aqua’s electrodes, ensures effluents meet stringent international standards for drinking water or discharge into city sewers or the environment.
“Thanks to our deep expertise in electro-oxidation for water treatment and our synergistic partnership with pro aqua, we can now offer our clients an industry-leading, durable, modular and scalable solution that helps them meet even the most stringent regulatory requirements for on-site elimination of water contaminants,” said André-Martin Bouchard, Global Director, Earth & Environment, WSP.
He concluded: “By setting a new benchmark for water quality and safety worldwide, we are also unlocking new commercial opportunities in water-related services—a key high-growth area in our current strategic cycle.”
Veolia has constructed one of the largest PFAS treatment systems in the United States, ensuring high-quality drinking water for over 100,000 residents in the state of Georgia.
The PFAS treatment plant will remove regulated PFAS compounds from drinking water, fully meeting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) PFAS regulations.
It establishes a replicable model for cost-effective PFAS treatment projects in water systems globally.
Estelle Brachlianoff, CEO of Veolia, said: “For the 100,000 people who rely on high-quality water from Veolia in Delaware, the Stanton PFAS treatment system is a generational improvement in public health and environmental protection that will strengthen communities and create opportunities long into the future.”
Achieving PFAS treatment at over 100 sites
The $35m facility comes in addition to 33 existing PFAS treatment systems Veolia already operates for water customers in the United States.
Veolia will continue to install treatment systems to achieve PFAS treatment at more than 100 water production sites across the country in the coming years, which will help secure high-quality drinking water for nearly 2 million people and comply with regulations in the most cost-effective manner possible.
The successful delivery of PFAS treatment for drinking water in Delaware exemplifies how the company’s end-to-end solutions can manage PFAS from testing through treatment and responsible disposal.
The Stanton Plant: Working to meet EPA regulations
The Stanton PFAS treatment plant began construction in early 2022, ahead of the new EPA regulations for some PFAS levels in drinking water, and worked methodically to deliver a state-of-the-art plant that minimised construction costs and left maximum flexibility for the future.
It took three years to design and build the 17,600-square-foot facility, which features 42 large vessels, each 22 feet high and filled with 40,000 pounds of granular activated carbon.
The vessels are designed and optimised for the carbon material to absorb regulated PFAS compounds from up to 30 million gallons of water per day that enter the plant from two nearby rivers. The massive vessels were installed first, and the building was constructed around them, requiring precise coordination and timing during the construction process.
“The Stanton Water Treatment Plant will play a vital role in tackling this challenge by treating PFAS on the front end of the water system,” explained Delaware Governor Matt Meyer.
“Veolia’s leadership in developing one of the largest treatment facilities in the country reflects a strong commitment to proactive public health protection and underscores our administration’s dedication to ensuring clean, safe water for Delawareans.”
The plant features a laboratory that continually tests new filtration media and treatment methods, providing additional flexibility and potential cost savings in the future.
Apple overhauled the naming system for all its operating systems to use a year-based unified version number. As someone who dreads deciphering model numbers, I say Apple should do the same for its devices, too.
Apple’s Year-Based OS Naming Is Perfect
During its WWDC 2025 keynote held on June 9, Apple switched from its old naming system to a unified version number for all its operating systems, including iOS, watchOS, tvOS, macOS, visionOS, and iPadOS.
With this change, all the new versions of Apple’s operating systems use the last two digits of the follow-up year after the official launch. Instead of relying on incremental version numbers or arbitrary names, this approach gives users immediate context on when the OS was released.
Related
7 iOS 26 Features You’ll Actually Want to Use
The very best of iOS 26.
For example, major software versions launched at the WWDC 2025 event use version number 26, such as iOS 26 and watchOS 26. The new major update in 2026 will use version number 27, and subsequent updates will follow the same pattern. This unification of OS versioning numbers is a refreshing change that brings much-needed clarity to Apple’s software lineup.
Compare this to what we had previously, and the difference is night and day. For instance, in 2024, Apple unveiled various major updates to its operating systems, including iOS 18, iPadOS 18, macOS 15, watchOS 11, tvOS 18, and VisionOS 1.0. That inconsistency made it a mess.
The new system makes it easy to tell what’s new and what’s outdated. You don’t even have to closely follow the tech news to know when iOS 26 was launched (much like a car’s model year).
Apple’s Hardware Naming Has Grown Confusing
Apple’s hardware product naming is a mess, and it has recently become even more confusing in some product lineups. The iPad lineup is a perfect example of this confusion. While it’s easy to distinguish between main product lineups such as iPad, iPad mini, iPad Air, and iPad Pro, the issue lies in the actual product names.
The latest iPad models across each lineup, as of this writing, are the iPad (11th-gen), iPad mini (7th-gen), iPad Air (7th-gen), and iPad Pro (7th-gen). Some were released in 2024, while others were released in 2025.
And to make it worse, Apple commonly only mentions the major lineup, such as the iPad mini or Pro, without specifying the generation or officially attaching the chip to the name. If you’re in the market for a new iPad, you may not know which one is the latest because the naming system is inconsistent. The issue is, you wouldn’t know unless you looked it up or are an avid follower of Apple’s product releases.
Related
What Is Apple’s WWDC Event and Why Does It Matter?
Every year, Apple hosts a special event in June called WWDC. Here’s everything you need to know about it.
For MacBooks, Apple only includes the display size in the name and doesn’t mention when the device was launched. For example, the name “14-inch MacBook Pro” doesn’t reveal any details about the device, except for the display size. The naming scheme for the company’s smartwatch series is similarly vague; “Apple Watch Series 10” lets you know it’s the 10th model, but not how new it is.
Year-Based Hardware Names Would Make Life Easier
Apple switching to a year-based naming system for hardware would solve these issues, just its new OS versioning system has. Currently, keeping track of Apple’s product lineup requires digging into technical specifications or checking release dates.
Imagine how simple we would have it if Apple used names like “2025 MacBook Air”, “2025 MacBook Pro”, “iPad Pro 26”, “Apple Watch Ultra 27”, and “iPhone 26 Pro”. Straight off the bat, you can tell when the model was released. It becomes easy to distinguish between older models and the latest generation without needing to decipher cryptic chip names or search for the release year online. Non-tech-savvy users will feel even more confident when navigating upgrades or selecting the right product.
Zarif Ali / MakeUseOf
Additionally, it would bring consistency across Apple’s hardware ecosystem. This isn’t a radical idea, and Apple wouldn’t be the first one to do so. A recent example is Apple’s competitor Samsung, which adopted a year-based naming scheme for its flagship Galaxy S series in 2020. At that time, Samsung moved the version number for its flagship series from S10 to S20.
That has made it easy to tell the latest offering from Samsung’s Galaxy S series, and Apple’s hardware products would benefit from such simplicity. By doing so, it’ll be much simpler to choose what to buy when the signs it’s time to upgrade your iPad appear.
Apple’s new year-based OS naming system is a step in the right direction. It not only simplifies software versions, but also makes identifying the current release effortless. However, that’s only for Apple’s OSes; the hardware lineup could also benefit from such streamlining. If Apple applied the same straightforward naming approach to its devices, it would make shopping far easier.
Scientists have long known that psychedelics like LSD can help the brain grow new connections. These drugs promote something called neuroplasticity, which helps the brain heal from mental illness. But there’s a major problem: hallucinations. Drugs like LSD come with intense mind-altering effects, which can be risky or even dangerous—especially for people with schizophrenia or a history of psychosis.
Published in the journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers at a major university have taken a bold step forward. By flipping the position of just two atoms in the LSD molecule, they’ve created a new drug, called JRT, that holds onto all the brain-healing power of LSD—but without the hallucinogenic effects.
“Basically, what we did here is a tire rotation,” said David E. Olson, director of the Institute for Psychedelics and Neurotherapeutics and a professor of chemistry, and biochemistry and molecular medicine at UC Davis. “By just transposing two atoms in LSD, we significantly improved JRT’s selectivity profile and reduced its hallucinogenic potential.”
A cortical neuron treated with JRT, a synthetic molecule similar to the psychedelic drug LSD. Drugs like JRT might enable new treatments for conditions such as schizophrenia, without the hallucinations and other side effects of psychedelics. (CREDIT: Lee E. Dunlap, UC Davis Institute for Psychedelics and Neurotherapeutics)
This change is small in structure but huge in outcome. In lab experiments with mice, JRT promoted brain growth, boosted mental flexibility, and even showed powerful antidepressant effects—all without triggering behaviors linked to hallucinations or psychosis.
When the team tested JRT, the results were striking. The drug made brain cells grow and connect more easily. It increased dendritic spine density in the prefrontal cortex by 46%. These spines are tiny branches that allow brain cells to talk to each other. It also boosted the number of synapses—where messages pass between cells—by 18%.
That kind of growth matters. People with mental health conditions like depression, schizophrenia, and addiction often have fewer of these brain connections. Their brains show signs of atrophy and lost connections, especially in areas that control emotions and decision-making. JRT helps rebuild these networks.
Unlike LSD, JRT did not cause mice to act in ways linked to hallucinations. It also didn’t trigger gene patterns that are associated with schizophrenia. In fact, it showed positive effects on behaviors and thinking tasks linked to schizophrenia symptoms, especially cognitive problems and a lack of joy or motivation.
“JRT has extremely high therapeutic potential,” Olson explained. “Right now, we are testing it in other disease models, improving its synthesis, and creating new analogues of JRT that might be even better.”
Schizophrenia affects about 0.5% of the global population. The condition causes hallucinations, delusions, emotional numbness, and poor memory or attention. Current medications mainly treat the hallucinations, called “positive symptoms,” but not the emotional or cognitive symptoms.
One drug, clozapine, can help with these harder-to-treat symptoms—but it comes with serious side effects and isn’t used as a first option.
Structural basis for the rational design of JRT. (CREDIT: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
That’s where JRT could come in. It targets the 5-HT2A serotonin receptors, the same ones psychedelics use to boost brain plasticity. But instead of shutting these receptors down, like traditional antipsychotic drugs do, JRT activates them in a way that promotes healing. This difference could help fix the underlying brain changes linked to schizophrenia—without the high risk of hallucinations.
This is a huge shift in thinking. For years, experts avoided using psychedelics in patients with schizophrenia. The risks were too high. Emergency room visits linked to psychedelics often involve psychotic episodes. But JRT may change that equation.
“No one really wants to give a hallucinogenic molecule like LSD to a patient with schizophrenia,” Olson said. “The development of JRT emphasizes that we can use psychedelics like LSD as starting points to make better medicines.”
Creating JRT wasn’t easy. It took almost five years to complete the 12-step chemical process to make the molecule. The name JRT honors Jeremy R. Tuck, a former student in Olson’s lab who first created it.
Total synthesis of JRT. (CREDIT: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
JRT has the same molecular weight and general shape as LSD. But that small atomic switch made it behave very differently. It became highly selective for the 5-HT2A receptor—the key site for encouraging brain cell growth—while avoiding the responses that cause hallucinations.
One major test involved “head-twitch responses” in mice, a behavior linked to hallucinogenic activity. LSD triggers this response strongly. JRT did not.
JRT also passed tests for depression. In fact, it worked about 100 times more powerfully than ketamine, one of the fastest-working antidepressants on the market. Unlike ketamine, which can cause dissociation and other side effects, JRT seemed to offer its benefits without major risks.
Beyond mood, JRT improved “reversal learning”—a mental skill involving flexible thinking. This is often impaired in people with schizophrenia and other brain disorders. In mice, JRT restored this ability, suggesting it could help with attention, planning, and problem-solving in humans.
(+)-JRT is highly selective for serotonin receptors. (CREDIT: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
Psychedelic-like drugs that don’t cause hallucinations are known as nonhallucinogenic psychoplastogens. They are part of a new class of treatments being explored for depression, PTSD, addiction, and now schizophrenia. These molecules aim to repair the brain without disrupting reality.
Until now, most of these compounds were based on tryptamine or ibogaine structures. JRT stands out because it is based on LSD’s unique shape—a four-ringed ergoline structure. LSD is one of the most powerful psychedelics ever discovered, so adapting it safely could unlock major therapeutic benefits.
The JRT compound proves that tiny changes in molecular structure can lead to big shifts in how a drug behaves. This could inspire a wave of future drugs that borrow from psychedelics without carrying their risks.
Olson’s lab continues to refine the drug, looking to improve how it’s made and testing new versions that might work even better. They are also studying JRT in models of other brain diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and major depression.
If those results hold up in future human trials, JRT may one day help people with some of the hardest-to-treat brain conditions feel and function better — without losing touch with reality.
Tinnitus—the unrelenting perception of sound without any external cause—affects about 15% of adults across the country. While it may come and go for some, nearly 40% of those living with the condition face chronic symptoms that deeply affect their daily lives.
Exploring the Brain’s Impact
The study zeroed in on somatic tinnitus, which affects roughly 70% of those with the condition. This form is unique in that the sound’s pitch or loudness can change with simple physical actions—like clenching the jaw or pressing the forehead. That connection to movement hinted at a deeper link with the body’s sensory pathways.
40% of those living with tinnitus face chronic symptoms that deeply affect their daily lives. (CREDIT: CC BY-SA 4.0)
“The solution lies in understanding the brain’s mechanisms,” said Dr. Susan Shore, Professor Emerita at Michigan Medicine. “It’s about personalizing the approach to harness these mechanisms for alleviating tinnitus.” Her team focused on how the somatosensory system—responsible for integrating touch, movement, and sound—might hold the key.
Published in JAMA Network Open, the study explored a technique called bisensory stimulation. This method uses paired signals—sound and touch—to target a critical hub in the brain: the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). That region plays a central role in processing both sound and sensory input.
In people with tinnitus, the DCN misfires. Instead of sending clear signals, its nerve cells—specifically fusiform cells—fire spontaneously and in sync. That abnormal rhythm correlates with the persistent noise people hear, making the condition hard to ignore.
Earlier work in animals showed that timed bisensory stimulation could disrupt those faulty patterns. By restoring normal activity in the DCN, guinea pigs experienced relief from tinnitus. That success laid the foundation for the first human trials—bringing real hope to millions seeking silence.
Translational Breakthroughs
Building on animal studies, Dr. Shore’s team conducted a double-blind, crossover randomized clinical trial with 99 participants. Eligible individuals had bothersome somatic tinnitus and normal-to-moderate hearing loss.
Each participant received a take-home device programmed to match their personal tinnitus spectrum. The devices combined auditory stimuli replicating the participant’s tinnitus with electrical stimulation to provide bisensory input.
Participants underwent two treatment phases over 18 weeks: six weeks of active bisensory stimulation and six weeks of auditory-only control treatment, with washout periods in between. Neither the participants nor the researchers knew which phase was active.
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Scores in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) and Per Protocol (PP) Populations. (CREDIT: JAMA Network Open)
The results were clear and compelling. During the active treatment phases, participants experienced significant reductions in tinnitus loudness and distress.
On average, TFI and THI scores improved markedly, with 60% of participants reporting substantial symptom relief after six weeks of bisensory stimulation. In contrast, the control treatment showed minimal impact.
“Our previous studies hinted at this outcome,” Shore noted. “The longer the bisensory treatment, the more profound the relief.” Measurements of fusiform cell activity confirmed reduced spontaneous firing and synchrony, correlating with participants’ improved symptoms.
Tinnitus Loudness in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) and Per Protocol (PP) Populations. Error bars represent the SEM. dB SL indicates decibel sensation level. The solid horizontal line represents mean baseline value/normalized reference at week 0. (CREDIT: JAMA Network Open)
Towards a New Standard of Care
The implications of this research extend far beyond the study itself. Shore’s findings open the door to personalized bisensory stimulation as a viable treatment for tinnitus.
Her team’s innovative device has already caught the attention of Auricle Inc., a startup dedicated to commercializing the technology. Supported by the University of Michigan’s Innovation Partnerships, Auricle aims to secure regulatory approval and bring this groundbreaking therapy to market.
“The horizon looks promising,” Shore remarked. “Our findings provide a pathway for effective, personalized tinnitus treatment.”
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) Scores in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) and Per Protocol (PP) Populations. Error bars represent the SEM. The solid horizontal line represents the mean baseline value/normalized reference at week 0. (CREDIT: JAMA Network Open)
As millions worldwide struggle with the persistent noise of tinnitus, this research offers hope for a future free from its debilitating effects. By harnessing the brain’s own mechanisms, bisensory stimulation represents a transformative step in tinnitus care.
For tinnitus sufferers, the days of silent agony might soon be a thing of the past.
Patients and healthcare providers are set to benefit from a new era in cancer treatment as the UK Government slashes red tape to unleash life-saving innovation.
NHS patients will be the first in Europe to benefit from a ground-breaking, non-invasive liver cancer treatment, as the government’s Plan for Change slashes burdensome red tape and drives innovation, establishing Britain’s role as a medical technology powerhouse.
Using ultrasound technology, the device, developed by US-based company HistoSonics, destroys tumours without surgery, scalpels, or radiation, with minimal damage to surrounding organs.
Patients stand to benefit from faster recovery times, potentially higher survival rates, fewer potentially dangerous complications, and shorter hospital stays. All this helps reduce wait times for others, marking a new era in cancer treatment.
The new cancer treatment delivers unlimited benefits
Ongoing research is exploring the potential of the new cancer treatment to transform other hard-to-reach tumours – including kidney and pancreatic cancers – bringing hope to even more NHS patients in the future.
Treatment is delivered via a single short session, potentially taking no longer than 30 minutes, with limited or no pain, a quick recovery, and can be performed as a day case.
Available through the UK’s Innovative Devices Access Pathway programme, a government-funded scheme designed to accelerate the introduction of cutting-edge health innovations to the market, NHS patients can benefit from technology years earlier than planned.
Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: “Through our Plan for Change, we are slashing red tape, so game-changing new treatments reach the NHS front line quicker, transforming healthcare.
“Our common-sense approach to regulation will streamline approval processes so countless more patients are liberated from life-limiting conditions.”
First patients to be treated this summer
The new cancer treatment, called histotripsy, is being introduced at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, part of the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH), with the first NHS patients being treated using the game-changing device this summer.
The technology was procured and installed thanks to a generous donation from the Li Ka Shing Foundation to the University of Cambridge, which has been a longstanding supporter of cancer research at the University.
“Histotripsy is an exciting new technology that will make a huge difference to patients,” stated Roland Sinker, Chief Executive of Cambridge University Hospitals.
“By offering this non-invasive, more targeted treatment, we can care for more people as outpatients and free up time for surgeons to treat more complex cases.
“The faster recovery times mean patients will be able to return to their normal lives more quickly, which will also reduce pressure on hospital beds, helping us ensure that patients can receive the right treatment at the right time.”
Securing the UK’s position as a global health tech leader
The Government’s Plan for Change is focused on securing the UK’s position as a global tech powerhouse, including in healthcare, which fosters innovation to transform the lives of working people and deliver a decade of national renewal.
The move delivers on the government’s commitment to tackle bureaucracy that blocks investment and regulatory complexity, which has previously stifled growth.
Using human cells, researchers were able to create a novel cervix-on-a-chip model to study how the vaginal microbiome affects pregnancy
By Grace Wade
A section of the cervix
OVERSEAS/COLLECTION CNRI/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Scientists have coaxed human cells to form a miniature replica of the cervix during pregnancy. This so-called cervix-on-a-chip reveals how inflammation and the vaginal microbiome can contribute to premature birth – and identifies a possible treatment to prevent it.
Premature birth – when a baby is born before 37 weeks of pregnancy – affects more than 13 million infants each year and is the second leading cause of childhood mortality and disability. Yet there are no effective…
Although the brain is our most complex organ, the ways to treat it have historically been rather simple. Typically, surgeons lesioned (damaged) a structure or a pathway in the hope that this would “correct the imbalance” that led to the disease. Candidate structures for lesioning were usually found by trial and error, serendipity or experiments in animals.
While performing one such surgery in 1987, French neurosurgeon Alim-Louis Benabid noticed that the electrical stimulation he performed to locate the right spot to lesion had effects similar to the lesion itself. This discovery led to a new treatment: deep brain stimulation. It involved a pacemaker delivering electrical pulses via electrodes implanted in specific spots in the brain.
This treatment has been used to treat advanced Parkinson’s since the early 2000s. However, until today, the stimulator settings had to remain constant once they were set by a specialised doctor or nurse and could only be changed when the patient was next seen in the clinic.
Accordingly, most researchers and doctors thought of stimulation as merely an adjustable and reversible way of lesioning. But these days the field is undergoing a revolution that challenges this view.
Adaptive deep brain stimulation was approved earlier this year by the US and European health authorities. It involves a computer interpreting brain activity and deciding whether to adjust the stimulation amplitude up or down to achieve the best relief of a patient’s symptoms.
Parkinson’s is a complex disorder with fluctuating symptoms that are greatly affected by the drugs a patient takes several times a day. While for some patients constant stimulation does a good job controlling their symptoms, for others it is too strong some of the time and overly weak at other times.
Ideally, the treatment should only kick in when it is most helpful.
The discovery that made adaptive stimulation possible was made by scientists at University College London over two decades ago, around the time when the first patients with Parkinson’s started getting electrodes implanted in the UK National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery.
When recording deep brain activity from these electrodes shortly after the surgery, the scientists noticed that a particular kind of brain wave appeared when a patient stopped their medication and their symptoms worsened.
The waves went away when the patients took their medication and started feeling better. It took a decade of further research before the same team of scientists first attempted to use the brain waves to control stimulation.
The idea is akin to a thermostat controlling an air conditioner. When the waves (temperature) reach a certain threshold, an electronic control circuit turns the stimulator (airconditioner) on. This reduces the waves and when they go away the stimulation can be turned off for a while until the waves re-emerge.
The original setup was bulky and could only be used in the hospital, and it took another decade to make it fit inside a device smaller than a matchbox that could be implanted in a patient’s chest.
New challenges
While the option to make brain stimulation adaptive gives new tools to doctors and nurses to fit stimulation to a patient in the best possible way, it comes with new challenges.
Even with the original fixed settings, there are many parameters doctors have to set to ensure effective treatment with minimal side-effects. Making stimulation adaptive adds another layer of complexity and puts extra demand on a clinical team’s time and attention.
In the case of Parkinson’s, stimulation effects are almost immediate so it is relatively easy to see how well particular constant settings work. But an adaptive setting must be tested over at least a few days to see how well it copes with the patient’s daily routine and medication cycles.
Adaptive stimulators also come with sensing abilities. They can record the harmful brain wave levels over days and weeks so that the clinical team can review them and see how well they are controlled.
These possibilities are new in the treatment of Parkinson’s, although similar implanted devices have been in use for years by cardiologists and epileptologists (neurologists who specialise in epilepsy).
Studying brain waves recorded by the smart stimulators in Parkinson’s patients opens new doors for understanding other diseases. Many patients suffer from problems such as depression and cognitive decline. Researchers could search for features in their brain signals that track the severity of these symptoms using AI tools to find relations too subtle or too complex for a human observer.
A parallel branch of deep brain stimulation research is focused on precisely mapping out the brain circuits responsible for different neurological and psychiatric symptoms. Several recent studies reported successes in treating depression, OCD and severe headaches.
Stimulating in the right place at the right time considering what the patient is doing is where the field is heading. With the basic technology now in place, progress could be rapid.
A baby born with a rare genetic disease is “growing and thriving” after getting bespoke gene therapy.
It’s the first time anyone in the world has been given an experimental gene-editing treatment designed specifically for their disease and took scientists just seven months to develop.
Nine-and-a-half-month-old KJ Muldoon, from Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania, has a rare metabolic condition – known as severe carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) deficiency – that meant he has spent the first months of his life in a US hospital on a very restrictive diet.
In February, however, the boy received the first dose of his bespoke treatment and then follow-up doses in March and April.
“We prayed, we talked to people, we gathered information, and we eventually decided that this was the way we were going to go,” said KJ’s father Kyle Muldoon.
KJ has been able to eat more normally and has recovered well from illnesses like colds, which can strain the body and exacerbate his symptoms.
He also now takes fewer medications.
Some experts estimate severe CPS1 deficiency affects one in a million babies. Those infants lack an enzyme needed to help remove ammonia from the body, so it can build up in their blood and become toxic.
“We’re still very much in the early stages of understanding what this medication may have done for KJ,” said study author Dr Rebecca Ahrens-Nicklas, a gene therapy expert at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
“But every day, he’s showing us signs that he’s growing and thriving.”
Image: KJ with his siblings after a dose of an experimental gene-editing treatment in April 2025. Pic: Chloe Dawson/Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Read more from climate, science and technology: Why do the moon’s two sides look so different? AIs can make collective decisions and influence each other Warning of heat impact on pregnant women and newborns
Considering how poorly KJ had been, “any time we see even the smallest milestone that he’s meeting – like a little wave or rolling over – that’s a big moment for us”, said his mother Nicole Muldoon.
The team behind KJ’s treatment, made up of experts from CHOP and the University of Pennsylvania, published the results of their work in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Follow the World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Gene therapy is an innovative treatment that aims to cure disease at the source, by editing the DNA causing the problem.
The scientists working on KJ’s case used CRISPR, the gene editing tool that won its inventors the Nobel Prize in 2020.
In KJ’s case, the team found the disease-causing mutation in his genes and created the treatment to flip a “letter” in his genetic code to the correct type.
“This is the first step towards the use of gene editing therapies to treat a wide variety of rare genetic disorders for which there are currently no definitive medical treatments,” said Dr Kiran Musunuru, a University of Pennsylvania gene-editing expert who co-authored the study.
The scientists hope that by publishing the results of their treatment quickly, it’ll help others to test out similar bespoke treatments.
“Once someone comes with a breakthrough like this, it will take no time” for other teams to apply the lessons and move forward, said Carlos Moraes, a neurology professor at the University of Miami, who wasn’t involved in the study.
“There are barriers, but I predict that they are going to be crossed in the next five to 10 years. Then the whole field will move as a block because we’re pretty much ready.”
It’s the 11-minute space trip heard round the world — and it just won’t go away.
Weeks on from Katy Perry’s epic girlboss trip to the outer atmosphere, the multi-millionaire pop musician says she’s been “battered and bruised” by the internet’s backlash to her garish stunt.
The all-female space trip — which happened on April 14 via a spacecraft owned by billionaire Jeff Bezos — was widely panned as an ostentatious display of wealth and privilege, a PR stunt wrapped in a faux-feminist veneer, and a damning moment heralding the emptiness and waste of private space travel.
Under a post by a Katy Perry fan page, the fabulously wealthy pop star lavished paragraphs of praise on her ride-or-dies: “I’m so grateful for you guys. We’re in this beautiful and wild journey together.”
“When the ‘online’ world tries to make me a human Piñata,” Perry continues, “I take it with grace and send them love, cause I know so many people are hurting in so many ways and the internet is very much so a dumping ground for unhinged and unhealed.”
She goes on to admit that she’s not perfect, but falls short of addressing the class criticism underlying the bad press that’s plagued her for weeks.
“I’m on a human journey playing the game of life with an audience of many and sometimes I fall but… I get back up and go on and continue to play the game and somehow through my battered and bruised adventure I keep looking to the light and in that light a new level UNLOCKS,” she concluded.
Though Perry claims she’s responded with grace, her actions tell a different story.
The popstar previously gushed that her brief stint in space — which cost millions of dollars — was “about making space for future women and taking up space and belonging,” vastly overlooking the untold millions of working women who will go their whole lives without earning the kind of money Perry makes in a day.
She’s also struggling to sell tickets for her Lifetimes tour, after an insider revealed Perry believed the spaceflight would help ignite fervor equal to Taylor Swift’s record breaking Eras tour.
And Perry definitely didn’t directher publicist to chastise the Wendy’s social media team as the backlash mounted, after the fast food chain quipped, “can we send her back?”
“Wendy’s should ‘do the right thing’… apologize and do better in the future,” an “anonymous source” seethed to People magazine.
Whether or not the backlash is deserved is certainly a matter of opinion. But whether the “woe is me” treatment will result in more ticket sales is a matter of optics — and Katy Perry’s aren’t looking good.
More on Katy Perry’s space trip: There’s Something Incredibly Sketchy About How They Opened the Hatch on Katy Perry’s Rocket