We are taking part in a global social experiment, largely without signing up. Every day, drivers request directions for routes they once knew. Writers open a chat window before facing a blank page. Hospitals, courts, and employers lean further on model-generated scores. Each choice appears minor. Together, they alter where knowledge resides, who exercises judgment, and what happens when the system fails. Tools may empower us to do more, faster at lower cost. But what are the costs? The consequences of generative artificial intelligence (AI) go far beyond the convenience once offered by elevators or calculators. AI has entered the thought process itself. It is increasingly woven into the chain through which we formulate questions, interpret evidence, and decide what deserves attention. But AI-powered empowerment is an oxymoron. When individuals and institutions continuously transfer creation, judgment, execution, and information to a system, they gradually lose the ability to create, grasp, and master the processes that the tool was only meant to make better. Ergo, the tool is empowered at the expense of those who deploy …