All posts tagged: editor: michael crawford

Beyond Pathology and Superpower: Neurodivergence and the Multiplicity of Epistemic Injustice

Beyond Pathology and Superpower: Neurodivergence and the Multiplicity of Epistemic Injustice

Upon being diagnosed with autism back in 2023, I was struck by the two distinct reactions I encountered, which I label (a) the pathology narrative and (b) the superpower narrative. Both attitudes came from well-meaning friends and family members, yet they inexplicably unsettled me, as the reasons behind my discomfort were not fully intelligible at the time. Examples of the pathology narrative included exclamations such as “the diagnosis must be wrong, there is nothing wrong with you” and the somewhat misleading advice to “not let my autism define me.” Although those specific instances stemmed from a misguided desire to be supportive, the former framed my minority cognitive style as inherently inferior, and the latter entailed the hidden assumption that my autism was inessential to who I am. Such advice did not feel applicable to neurodivergence, which constitutes pervasive neurological difference, a different way of experiencing the world rather than a detachable trait. Telling an autistic person not to let their condition define them reduces their neurology to an accessory.  The pathology narrative felt demeaning and …

What Can You Be Medically Gaslit About?

What Can You Be Medically Gaslit About?

The term “gaslighting” can be traced back to Patrick Hamilton’s 1938 play Gas Light (adapted into films in 1940 and 1944), in which a devious husband manipulates his wife into believing that she is losing her mind by repeatedly invalidating her experiences, including her perception that the gas lights in their house are dimming.  Scholarly interest in the concept of gaslighting has ballooned in recent years. While there is broad agreement that gaslighting involves causing someone to doubt their own experiences, memory or perhaps interpretation of events, views diverge on what else is required. Does gaslighting require (malicious) intent, or can it also be unintentional? Does the target have to experience psychological harm as a result? Does the gaslighter have to be another person, or can one also be gaslit by oneself or the society at large? The jury is still out on these questions. As debates over gaslighting have progressed, attention has also turned to its manifestations in medical contexts; the term “medical gaslighting” is now used to describe some situations where patients’ concerns …

Reflections on Mapping an A–Z Philosophy BlackList

Reflections on Mapping an A–Z Philosophy BlackList

Introduction First launched in 2025 as part of Black History Month programming, the project has grown into what is now titled the A–Z Philosophy BlackList, an expanding intellectual archive that currently features 158 names and counting. Led by Zinhle ka’Nobuhlaluse alongside two Southwestern undergraduate students, Jayden Dawson and Raven Waugh, this list names Black intellectuals whose contributions have informed both philosophy and wider academic fields. While not exhaustive, the list is designed as an invitation to engage with a diverse range of thinkers whose ideas continue to shape knowledge production. Moreover, we acknowledge that any such project reflects the situated perspective of its producers and may inevitably leave some folks out. Importantly, Blackness in this project is framed as a political identity drawing from the South African Black Consciousness philosophy as espoused in Bantu Steve Biko’s I Write What I Like, and N.C. Manganyi’s Being-Black-In-The-World. Each thinker respectively defined Blackness as a political identity, a radical humanism that aimed to reject the idea of blackness as non-white, qua non-human as classified by the Apartheid regime. …

Doing Philosophy in a Borrowed Tongue

Doing Philosophy in a Borrowed Tongue

Until I began my Ph.D. in the United States, I had spent my entire life in Korea, speaking Korean. While I had a sense of “using” other languages, having studied Chinese in high school, French in college, and English while studying analytic philosophy, I had never really experienced what it meant to “live” in a second language. During my first year as a Ph.D. student in the Philosophy department, I have experienced the burden of language barriers and the reality of untranslatability. As many international students can resonate, the self that speaks English feels remarkably different from the self that speaks one’s native tongue. In Korean, I am much funnier and bolder, more myself. My first semester was an ongoing struggle just to raise my hand and speak in graduate seminars. When translating my thoughts from Korean to English, the subtle nuances I intended to convey would vanish. I was painfully self-aware, terrified of speaking broken English. Whenever my limited English resulted an unsatisfactory presentation, I feared others would perceive this language deficiency as a …