Beyond Pathology and Superpower: Neurodivergence and the Multiplicity of Epistemic Injustice
Upon being diagnosed with autism back in 2023, I was struck by the two distinct reactions I encountered, which I label (a) the pathology narrative and (b) the superpower narrative. Both attitudes came from well-meaning friends and family members, yet they inexplicably unsettled me, as the reasons behind my discomfort were not fully intelligible at the time. Examples of the pathology narrative included exclamations such as “the diagnosis must be wrong, there is nothing wrong with you” and the somewhat misleading advice to “not let my autism define me.” Although those specific instances stemmed from a misguided desire to be supportive, the former framed my minority cognitive style as inherently inferior, and the latter entailed the hidden assumption that my autism was inessential to who I am. Such advice did not feel applicable to neurodivergence, which constitutes pervasive neurological difference, a different way of experiencing the world rather than a detachable trait. Telling an autistic person not to let their condition define them reduces their neurology to an accessory. The pathology narrative felt demeaning and …



