Why You Should Be More Skeptical the Next Time You Read a Health News Article
Last year, wasabi had a big moment. CBS News claimed the sushi condiment could offer a “boost in memory,” while USA Today suggested it was linked to “a better brain.” The New York Post noted it had “really substantial” cognitive benefits. Yes, the spicy green stuff you always wish is guacamole was lauded by the press following the release of a new study. However, what was not mentioned was that the study had a small sample size, was published in a low-quality journal, and was funded by Kinjirushi Co., the leading global manufacturer of wasabi products—quite literally Big Wasabi. While that doesn’t necessarily invalidate the study’s findings, it’s relevant information to pass on to the reader, isn’t it? It’s just one example, but hype is becoming more common as reporters increasingly regurgitate press releases with barely any skepticism or due diligence. This is one reason why, in 2016, epidemiologist Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, MD, started a newsletter where he covers many misrepresented studies, such as headlines suggesting light pollution increases the risks of Alzheimer’s (Forbes), common food …