All posts tagged: political campaigns

The Interesting Thing About ‘Manchin for President’

The Interesting Thing About ‘Manchin for President’

One of the greatest obstacles that an independent candidate faces when running for president is ballot access. Each state has its own requirements for names to appear on the ballot. In Tennessee, it’s 275 signatures; in California, it’s more than 200,000; in Iowa, a statewide caucus can be used instead of signatures. Winning ballot access across all 50 states is a massive undertaking for an independent candidate, which can cost $20 million to $30 million and begins up to two years before Election Day. Because of campaign-finance laws, for decades, only someone who was independently wealthy, like Ross Perot and Michael Bloomberg, could plausibly run as an independent. Campaign-finance laws place limits on the size of the contributions an individual can give to a federal political campaign or party committee. The maximum individual contribution to a campaign is $3,300, so a candidate who can’t self-fund would have to raise maximum contributions from 10,000 donors, or smaller contributions from an even larger number, simply to get on the ballot. Lora Kelley: RFK Jr.’s wild-card run But …

The Non-end of George Santos

The Non-end of George Santos

Fiction can be riveting, as the many lies that supported Representative George Santos’s political career have demonstrated. But facts can also be entertaining too—a point made by the House Ethics Committee’s investigation into the New York Republican, released today. The report is full of language that, even in the formal tone of congressional documents, is scorching. Here’s the short version: “Representative Santos’ conduct warrants public condemnation, is beneath the dignity of the office, and has brought severe discredit upon the House.” Furthermore, “Representative George Santos cannot be trusted.” And here’s a longer version, too precise and cutting to quote in part: Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit. He blatantly stole from his campaign. He deceived donors into providing what they thought were contributions to his campaign but were in fact payments for his personal benefit. He reported fictitious loans to his political committees to induce donors and party committees to make further contributions to his campaign—and then diverted more campaign money to himself as …

Poland Shows That Autocracy Is Not Inevitable

Poland Shows That Autocracy Is Not Inevitable

Thirty-four years ago, in June 1989, Poland woke up to a surprise. Despite a voting process rigged to favor the Communist Party; despite decades of propaganda supporting Communists and smearing anti-Communists; despite the regime’s control of the army, the police, and the secret police; the democratic opposition won, taking all of the seats that it was allowed to contest. A team of former dissidents took control of the government two months later—the first non-Communist government in Soviet-occupied Europe. In the decade that followed, Poland slowly decentralized the state and built a democracy. This morning, Poland woke up to a similar surprise. Since first winning power democratically in 2015, the nationalist-conservative party Law and Justice, or PiS, has turned state television into a propaganda tube, used state companies to fund its political campaigns, and politicized state administration. In the run-up to this election, it altered electoral laws and even leaked top-secret military documents, manipulating their contents for electoral gain. Even so, the party appears to have won only just over a third of the vote. Three …