Charge against man who burnt Quran ‘incorrectly worded’, CPS admits
The wording of a charge against a man who burnt a Quran in protest was “incorrectly applied”, the Crown Prosecution Service has admitted. Hamit Coskun was charged with intent to cause “harassment, alarm or distress” against “the religious institution of Islam” after burning a Quran outside the Turkish Consulate in February. Following interventions by the National Secular Society the CPS has said the wording of the charge was “incorrectly applied” and it has “substituted a new charge”. But the NSS said any conviction based on the facts of this case would suggest “the reinstatement of an offense of blasphemy in English law by the back door”. Blasphemy was abolished as a common law offence in England and Wales in 2008. Shadow justice secretary: “There are many things in our society that people find offensive, but that doesn’t make them criminal” Coskun said his expression was a protest against the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, for policies which he said are turning Turkey into a “base for radical Islamists”. He also said his protest was …