Tag: Lucasfilm

  • Is Disney Bad at Star Wars?

    Is Disney Bad at Star Wars?

    [ad_1]

    There’s an exchange in Star Wars: The Force Awakens when Rey and Finn are fleeing from stormtroopers and searching for a way to escape. Rey spots the legendary Millennium Falcon, declares it looks like “garbage,” and then quickly reconsiders: “The garbage will do!”  

    Increasingly, that’s the attitude some fans have about Disney’s Star Wars programming: “Look, we all know this isn’t fantastic anymore, but Star Wars is still Star Wars, and, therefore, it will do.”

    To be fair, Disney’s Star Wars shows and movies remain far from space junk. Their titles typically get glowing reviews from critics, and generate box office returns and streaming ratings that other studios would envy (though at a high cost).

    So let’s run through Disney’s Star Wars legacy to date, from The Force Awakens to The Acolyte, and see what conclusions might be drawn. Because several aspects of the company’s track record admittedly look shaky: A five-movie franchise that was halted after its box office returns trended the wrong direction. Six live-action TV shows, just one of which has been a multi-season hit. A startling number of projects put into development and then abandoned like starships on Bracca. And one wildly ambitious roleplay hotel that closed after little more than a year.

    It raises a question: Is Disney kind of bad at Star Wars? Or is this a case where a very high bar for success combined with a passionate fandom’s gripes tend to obscure what is otherwise a hugely popular and lucrative franchise? Let’s take a close look at all of it — the light side and the dark.

    THE FILMS: “LET THE PAST DIE, KILL IT IF YOU HAVE TO”

    Courtesy of Annie Leibovitz exclusively for Vanity Fair

    After buying Lucasfilm from George Lucas in 2012, Disney relaunched Star Wars as a franchise trilogy in 2015 with director J.J. Abrams’ The Force Awakens. The film was an absolute blockbuster. Yet surprisingly — and, as it turned out, problematically — the studio did not have a firm creative plan for the next two films (at least, not one that was followed).

    Rian Johnson’s 2017 sequel The Last Jedi took the story in a different direction that many loved and many didn’t. Then Abrams returned with 2019’s The Rise of Skywalker and tried to push the narrative closer to his original intentions. Comedians learn in improv class to always say “Yes, and…” to any idea introduced during a show, no matter how challenging. The studio and Abrams’ reaction to The Last Jedi was more like, “No, actually…” (Rey is a nobody. No, she’s a Palpatine!) The result was a trilogy that’s a mishmash of dueling creative visions. (Lucas took a similar I’m-making-this-up-as-I-go approach to his original trilogy, but it’s far easier to maintain a saga’s cohesion when all the films are led by the same person).

    The films’ box office also told a story. At a time when Disney’s Marvel movies kept breaking new ticket sales records, Force made an extraordinary $2 billion worldwide, Jedi dropped sharply to a still-huge $1.3 billion, and then Skywalker made $1 billion which is, you know, still $1 billion. These are incredible numbers for any film, but they were going the wrong way — when the third entry in your trilogy launching a new franchise sells half the tickets of the first, you probably made a wrong turn somewhere.

    Around the same time, the studio experimented with two stand-alone titles. There was 2016’s gorgeous-looking and compelling, if wildly uneven, Rogue One, earning $1 billion (a film whose reputation has improved since it was released). And 2018’s widely panned Solo, which made a disastrous-for-the-franchise $393 million (a film whose reputation has not improved since it was released). Both had behind-the-scenes drama and reshoots that saw their original directors being replaced during filming.

    After Rise of Skywalker, Disney paused making big screen Star Wars movies altogether, but continued to announce new films in development from top creatives. The list of well-known writers and directors who have come and gone is comically long: Rian Johnson (originally enlisted to make a new trilogy), David Benioff and Dan Weiss (also enlisted for a trilogy), Patty Jenkins, Colin Trevorrow, Damon Lindelof, David S. Goyer, Josh Trank, Guillermo del Toro, Taika Waititi, and Marvel chief Kevin Feige. Some of their projects were confidentially announced as movies that were definitely happening until they weren’t. And there are others which were never revealed publicly. 

    If all this seems rather chaotic for a studio that’s famously meticulous, well, yes, it does. The charitable read is that Star Wars movies should be very special and the studio is determined to get them right. A batch of projects are still the works: James Mangold is developing a Dawn of the Jedi feature, Shawn Levy is working on an untitled film, Jenkins’ Rogue Squadron was resurrected this year, and Lindelof’s feature starring Daisy Ridley’s Rey has shifted to director Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy. It’s uncertain which of these, if any, will be made.

    Even as the studio spat out announcement after announcement on the film side, Disney largely switched its focus to bringing Star Wars to TV for its Disney+ streaming service.

    THE SHOWS: “I CAN BRING YOU IN WARM OR I CAN BRING YOU IN COLD”

    ‘The Mandalorian‘

    Disney+/2020 Lucasfilm Ltd.

    Once again, Disney also came out of the gate incredibly strong. The 2019 debut season of Jon Favreau’s The Mandalorian nearly single-handedly made Disney+ an out-of-the box success, charmed critics and audiences, and was even nominated for an Emmy for best drama. Moreover, The Mandalorian proved live-action Star Wars on TV was possible — it’s easy to forget this show was considered a big gamble at the time (given Favreau also launched the MCU with 2008’s Iron Man, he deserves to be honored at one of those medal ceremonies on Yavin). In season three, The Mandalorian creatively stumbled a bit, ratings slipped (a little) and the show received backlash for the first time.

    Instead of a fourth season, Disney decided to pivot The Mandalorian to launch its first Star Wars feature film since The Rise of Skywalker. Coming in 2026, The Mandalorian & Grogu will probably perform well. Yet it also looks like Disney spent many years and untold capital struggling develop a new Star Wars movie and its best idea was an extra-long episode of a TV show.

    From The Mandalorian came 2021’s spin-off The Book of Boba Fett, which is where some problems with the franchise’s TV efforts first emerged. So much about this brief effort was weirdly clunky. Two Mandalorian episodes were inexplicably sandwiched into the show’s seven, and they felt like a Band-Aid effort to repair a struggling show. The Book of Boba Fett was originally a series, not a miniseries, but it was quickly considered concluded.

    There have been four new shows since:

    — 2022’s Obi-Wan Kenobi from showrunner Joby Harold and director Deborah Chow. Fans were excited to see Ewan McGregor reprise his role as Obi-Wan and Hayden Christensen return as Darth Vader. The show was likable enough (despite some weak sequences) and a winner in the ratings: Obi-Wan Kenobi opened to 1.03 billion minutes of viewing, according to Nielsen — even bigger than Mando season three’s opening of 823 million — and concluded with a strong 860 million for its finale. Obi-Wan Kenobi was a limited series, however, and there are no current plans for more episodes.

    —2022’s Andor from Rogue One fixer Tony Gilroy, who returned to make a prequel series to the film he swooped in to rescue midway through production. Andor was a grown-up Star Wars title that felt grounded and heavily used practical effects and on-location filming (instead of the LED volume wall technology used by the other shows for their backgrounds which sometimes makes them look like blurry stage plays). The show was also massively expensive, with a budget estimated to be as high as $250 million for 12 episodes. Critics and its fans loved the result, however, and Andor was Emmy nominated for best drama series. At 96 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, Andor is actually the best reviewed live-action Star Wars TV show or movie.

    Andor’s ratings did not fully reflect this esteem. It opened with 624 million minutes before falling into the 400 million range for subsequent weeks, then jumping back to 674 million for its finale. There will be a second season in 2025 to conclude the story. Gilroy originally pitched the show as five seasons and has said it was his decision to shorten the project. It would not be surprising if Andor‘s ratings pop for season two as more casual Star Wars fans discover the show.

    —2023’s Ahsoka from Clone Wars mastermind and Mandalorian co-chief Dave Filoni, now in the live-action driver’s seat for first time. The show received positive reviews (86 percent on Rotten Tomatoes), and a somewhat mixed reaction from fans. Ahsoka’s premiere ratings were comparable to The Mandalorian season three opener (829 million minutes), then it declined to average around 570 million minutes for the rest of its run. A second season was announced as in development in January, and sources say the new season will go into production next year.

    —2024’s The Acolyte from creator Leslye Headland. The series was set 100 years before The Phantom Menace and had franchise’s most diverse cast along with several female leads. The New York Times revealed the eight-episode series cost $180 million (only $10 million less than Dune: Part Two).

    The Acolyte received largely positive critic reviews (78 percent on Rotten Tomatoes) and sparked a raging culture war battle that once again exposed the ugly side of online fandom. The Acolyte’s backlash and criticism is difficult to parse as many fans detail their creative objections to the show’s storytelling and its bold take on Jedi lore — “just because we didn’t like this doesn’t mean we’re racist,” basically. Some other Acolyte bashers were, well, clearly racist.

    The Acolyte’s premiere ratings were the lowest to date for a live-action Star Wars series launch (488 million minutes, according to Nielsen’s U.S. streaming figures). Then the show’s ratings sunk further, with The Acolyte dropping out of Nielsen’s Top 10 entirely for several weeks (not typical for a Star Wars show). It was impossible for Disney to spin this one as a concluded story — the season ended on a cliffhanger — but The Acolyte is not getting a season two. The cancelation has been portrayed by some defenders as baffling, even conspiratorial, but the show’s ratings, trend and reception point to a pragmatic decision on the studio’s part.

    On Dec. 3, Disney is launching Jon Watts and Christopher Ford’s Skeleton Crew, which centers on a group of children embarking on a space adventure. Making an all-ages ratings smash is difficult nowadays, so having Skeleton Crew focus on kids — like Andor is targeted to grown-ups — might be a smart play. The creators have strongly suggested the show will be another one-and-done limited series, but Lucasfilm is considering Skeleton Crew a series (unless its ratings decide otherwise).

    LOOKING AHEAD: “WE HAVE HOPE. REBELLIONS ARE BUILT ON HOPE!”

    Skeleton Crew

    So that’s six live-action shows in five years. Just one — The Mandalorian — has been an outright hit with critics and fans and has delivered a multi-season run, which is the traditional model for TV success.

    This doesn’t mean a single season of TV cannot be a win; limited series are considered hits all the time. But there’s a reason popular close-ended limited series like the debut seasons of HBO’s The White Lotus and FX’s Shogun were given second season orders and became ongoing series. Making a show that can run for multiple seasons is the typical goal, even for streamers, because it encourages subscribers to stick around. There are also considerable start-up costs to making something new, particularly in the fantasy space — enormous amounts of production, costume and prop design, and all-around world building. The Acolyte season one took four years to make, but a second season would have likely only taken half that time. With an ongoing series, a company doesn’t have to work so hard and spend so much to keep re-earning its audience. One would think Disney would have wanted more juice from some of these squeezes. 

    Because what is left for Disney+ after Skeleton Crew? The final season of Andor and a second season of Ahsoka? In 2020, Disney bullishly announced 10 new Star Wars shows at an investor event, heralding a glorious new era of Star Wars TV. Those entries included Lando (now being re-developed by star Donald Glover and his brother Stephen into a film) and Rangers of the New Republic (scrapped for reasons). The prospect of being left with a single ongoing live-action Star Wars show after Andor concludes surely wasn’t the company’s hope coming out of that announcement. 

    Hanging over all of this is the increasing suspicion that the company may have wrung out the rag, creatively speaking, on storylines culled from Lucas’ original trilogy and his prequels. Even The Acolyte‘s haters should give the show credit for telling a story that’s far removed from the Skywalker Saga (as does Skeleton Crew). This isn’t entirely Disney’s fault, but it’s one the challenges moving forward. How do you make Star Wars feel fresh and new while still feeling like Star Wars and not like, say, Rebel Moon?

    The company has enjoyed more consistent results on the animated side, which has been largely championed by Filoni. Shows such as Rebels (2014), The Bad Batch (2021), Visions (2021) and Tales of the Jedi (2020) were critically acclaimed and well-liked by fans (Visions and Rebels have the highest Rotten Tomatoes scores for Star Wars content; tied at 98 percent). Another title, Resistance (2018), received about one third of the Nielsen viewership of Rebels, and ended after two seasons (with its creators saying that the story was simply finished).

    And what about Disney+ subscriptions? Aren’t subscriptions the real coin of the realm here? Disney+ took off like a rocket in 2019, steadily climbed to peak in the fourth quarter of 2022 with 164 million subs worldwide, and then started dropping for the first time to currently settle around 153 million.

    Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy — who has produced some of the most beloved and iconic movies in cinema history, in addition to successfully re-launching Star Wars in cinemas with Force and trailblazing into TV with Mando — has overseen the Star Wars franchise since 2012. Any mention of Kennedy amid a look at the Star Wars track record cannot be separated from the fact that she has been the target of hateful and ugly attacks fandom. South Park also piled on by mocking her in a recent episode. Still, Kennedy shouldn’t be considered immune from criticism and one thing recent political headlines have shown is the myth of “only I can do it” leadership.

    On the parks front, the company doesn’t publicly release its attendance numbers for each “land” so it’s tough to clock exactly how Star Wars land Galaxy’s Edge is faring at Disneylands across the plant. The company’s third quarter investor report stated the attraction “remains one of the most popular” in the park and ranks No. 1 in guest satisfaction (they also sold 1.2 million lightsabers, so there). But in 2023, the company’s infamous Star Wars interactive hotel experience Galactic Starcruiser, which reportedly cost nearly $1 billion, spectacularly blew up like Alderaan, shuttering its windowless “cabins” and blue-milk-slinging cantinas after one year. 

    The stealth goldmine of the franchise remains merchandising. Disney typically doesn’t release numbers for individual product lines, but sources say Star Wars merch generated a billion for the company last year. Baby Yoda, in particularly, has surely been a retail godsend (though it’s hard to imagine Bazil action figures flying off the shelves).

    During a presentation in March to fight an activist investor who accused the company of overspending, Disney also revealed Lucasfilm has generated nearly $12 billion in total revenue on its $4 billion investment. There’s so much stuffed into this fuzzy umbrella number, however, including non-Star Wars titles and projected future returns, and also so much left out (like, the cost of everything). So it’s tough to know what to make of that $12 billion other than “Star Wars generates a lot of money,” which you probably already knew.

    So let us — at long last! — get back to that big question in the headline.

    Is Disney bad at Star Wars? … On balance, no.

    Disney gave Star Wars fans what they wanted for decades — a lot more Star Wars, from different visionary filmmakers, and some of it has been terrific. A dormant franchise that once followed a single dynastic storyline has exploded into a more diverse galaxy of characters and stories. Even the oft-maligned sequel trilogy has sequences within each film that are inarguably stunning (for all its narrative flaws, The Rise of Skywalker‘s farewell scene between Han Solo and Kylo Ren is as moving as anything in the canon). And shows like The Mandalorian, Andor and Rebels clear even the highest bar a hardcore fan might reasonably set. A lot of the online uproar is a sign audiences are, at least, still very engaged and care about this franchise; a truer sign of failure would be apathy and disinterest.

    But here’s another question: Could Disney be better at Star Wars? … Cleary, yes.

    The company’s live-action movies and TV efforts, on average, could and should be better. In 2018, Disney CEO Bob Iger admitted the company made “a mistake” with Star Wars, making movies “a little too much, too fast.” After Iger temporarily left the company in 2020, Disney/Lucasfilm arguably made the same error again on the TV side. Lucas famously instructed his actors to be “faster and more intense,” but that doesn’t typically work as a franchise strategy (as Marvel has discovered, as well). It’s unclear if Star Wars requires more order or less — more Empire-like corporate oversight or more Rebellion-like creative chaos. But it’s long seemed like there’s somehow too much of both which has resulted in a master plan that’s constantly being rewritten, and content that sometimes feels undercooked and clunky. It’s not the fault of fans that they increasingly get “a bad feeling about this.”

    Any criticism from the sidelines, however, should be tempered with one final point: Making a successful Star War is really hard. Marvel movies — with their iconic stable of heroes who can be portrayed by different actors — are arguably easier. Lucas created this thing and made six live-action Star Wars films over several decade and only his first two were widely considered excellent by critics and fans alike (many younger fans adore his prequels, though they were never much loved by critics). This is also what makes making more content so tempting — the original Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back were profoundly amazing, and so captivated generations of fans, and have launched literally thousands of products and generated billions in direct and ancillary revenue.

    In 1981, Lucas changed the title of his first Star Wars film to A New Hope and the name is apt — it’s literally what’s fueled studio executives, creatives and fans ever since. Each time another Star Wars title opens with a rousing fanfare, a scroll and a star field, all of us get that same feeling — a new hope — over and over again.

    Rick Porter contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Star Wars: Hunters gets a June launch date for mobile and Nintendo Switch

    Star Wars: Hunters gets a June launch date for mobile and Nintendo Switch

    [ad_1]

    The launch date for Star Wars: Hunters, a 4v4 arena shooter for mobile platforms, has finally been announced after much anticipation. Lucasfilm Games and Zynga confirmed that the new game will be available June 4 on Nintendo Switch, Android and iOS.

    The game is styled as a third-person, player-versus-player “hero shooter” similar to Overwatch. Participants select their Star Wars personas from a diverse roster, featuring characters like Grozz the Wookie, Rieve the Dark Side Assassin, or J-3DI, a droid convinced of their Jedi identity, and fight it out on on the rocky terrain of the Outer Rim world Vespaara. 

    Players will find other familiar locations in the game, including the Ewok Village on the forest moon of Endor; Tatooine’s Mos Espa Podrace and Dune Sea Outpost; the Imperial stronghold of Vandor Railyard, and, of course, The Death Star.

    Star Wars: Hunters was first revealed in early 2021 through a teaser trailer, hinting at a full release later that year. Since then, there have been multiple closed beta tests and restricted access in specific regions. It seems that Disney and Zynga are now satisfied with the game’s state and poised to unveil it to the world.

    What are Star Wars: Hunters game modes?

    Star Wars: Hunters, a free-to-play title, will offer several game modes, among them:

    • Squad Brawl: A classic team deathmatch. First side to score 20 eliminations wins.
    • Dynamic Control: Teams fight for control over a rotating series of points across the map.
    • Power Control: Hold fixed points on the map for the longest and win.
    • Trophy Chase: Pursue the droid TR0-F33! on the map. The team that controls it the longest wins.

    Which characters are in Star Wars: Hunters?

    Star Wars: Hunters’ current character roster includes:

    • Diago: a Miraluka sharpshooter
    • Charr: a Trandoshan (Bossk) trapper
    • Sprocket: a Mon Calamari (Admiral Akbar) prodigy
    • Sentinel: an Imperial heavy gunner
    • Skora: a Rodian (Greedo) sawbones
    • Grozz: a Wookiee juggernaut
    • Imara Vex: an unrelenting bounty hunter
    • Zaina: a Rebel war hero
    • Rieve: the aforementioned dark side assassin
    • J-3DI: a Jedi droid
    • Utooni: a duo of Jawa scavengers
    • Slingshot: an Ugnaught speedster using a droideka
    • Aran Tal: a Mandalorian vanguard

    Featured image: Lucasfilm Games / Zynga

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gina Carano questions Disney’s lack of response to Pedro Pascal’s social media posts on trans rights

    Gina Carano questions Disney’s lack of response to Pedro Pascal’s social media posts on trans rights

    [ad_1]

    Fired Mandalorian actor Gina Carano has questioned posts shared by her former co-star Pedro Pascal in a new lawsuit against Disney and Lucasfilm.

    The actor, 41, is suing the studios for discrimination and wrongful termination after the former MMA fighter was dropped from the Star Wars spin-off in February 2021 after sharing a social media post in which she appeared to compare the Republican experience in the US to that of Jewish people during the Holocaust.

    On Tuesday (6 February), Carano, who played special forces warrior character Cara Dune, filed a lawsuit against her firing, citing the damaging of her reputation and discrimination based on her gender.

    In a section titled “Social Media Posts from Carano’s Co-Stars”, the lawsuit at one stage questioned Disney and Lucasfilm’s lack of response to posts shared on X/Twitter by her former co-star Pascal, with whom she previously claimed to reach an agreement with over their opposing beliefs.

    The lawsuit reads: “Carano respects the rights of her co-stars to express their views on social media, even if they differ from her own, and she remains personally fond of each of them. However, Defendants’ treatment of Carano stands in stark contrast to Defendants’ embrace of her male co- stars and other male employees, so the following examples are provided to demonstrate the discriminatory treatment Carano endured at the hands of Defendants.

    Carano’s lawyers then cited posts in which Pascal supported Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ rights, stating: “On June 27, 2020, Pascal posted two Disney-owned Muppet characters, Bert and Ernie, as activists waving a transgender and LGBTQ+ pride flag and promoting “Black Lives Matter” and “Defund the Police.”

    Another post shared in the lawsuit shows Pascal comparing Donald Trump to Hitler.

    It reads: “Upon information and belief, Pascal was not disciplined, required to review documentaries on any of these topics or speak to individuals with contrary points of view, or pressured to apologize for any of his posts. His employment was not terminated, and Defendants made no public statements about his social media posts, much less refer to them as “abhorrent.”

    Carano is seeking a court order that would force Lucasfilm to recast her and at least $75,000, plus punitive damages.

    “In addition to terminating her, Defendants refused to hire her for roles already promised, including but not limited to Season 3 of The Mandalorian, the new series Rangers of the New Republic, and planned future Stars Wars full length feature films (which have recently been announced) – all because of her political beliefs and in disparate treatment from her male co-workers,” the complaint asserts.

    Pedro Pascal and Gina Carano starred in ‘The Mandalorian’ together (Getty Images for Disney)Pedro Pascal and Gina Carano starred in ‘The Mandalorian’ together (Getty Images for Disney)

    Pedro Pascal and Gina Carano starred in ‘The Mandalorian’ together (Getty Images for Disney)

    The Independent has contacted Disney, Lucasfilm, Pascal and Hamill for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gina Carano sues Disney and LucasFilm over Mandalorian firing – in lawsuit backed by Elon Musk | Ents & Arts News

    Gina Carano sues Disney and LucasFilm over Mandalorian firing – in lawsuit backed by Elon Musk | Ents & Arts News

    [ad_1]

    Actress Gina Carano is suing Disney and LucasFilm for wrongful termination and discrimination, claiming she was dropped from The Mandalorian for expressing her “personal political opinions”.

    Carano was fired in February 2021 over political opinions she expressed on social media, the lawsuit said, after starring in two series of Disney+ Star Wars series The Mandalorian as Rebel ranger Cara Dune.

    The 41-year-old had referenced the Nazis’ treatment of Jewish people while discussing political differences in the US at the time.

    Production company LucasFilm then released a statement suggesting her “social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities are abhorrent and unacceptable”.

    Image:
    Carano starred as Cara Dune in the series. Pic: Lucasfilm/Disney/Kobal/Shutterstock

    The actress’s complaint, filed at the Californian District Court on Tuesday, is financially supported by X Corp, the Elon Musk-owned social media platform.

    She is seeking at least $75,000 (about £59,000) in compensatory damages and a trial by jury.

    In the court documents, it is claimed that Disney and LucasFilm “targeted, harassed, publicly humiliated, defamed, and went to great lengths to destroy Carano’s career”.

    Carano also claims she was treated differently to her male co-workers, according to the lawsuit.

    Lawyer Gene Schaerr, managing partner at Schaerr Jaffe, said: “Disney bullied Ms Carano, trying to force her to conform to their views about cultural and political issues, and when that bullying failed, they fired her.

    “Punishing employees for their speech on political or social issues is illegal under California law.”

    Carano, who began her career as a mixed martial arts fighter, has starred in other Hollywood franchises including Fast & Furious 6 as Riley Hicks, and Deadpool, in which she played Angel Dust.

    “We rely on our leaders and people in positions of power to be just, cool-headed and steady-handed and to be able to listen to all sides of the story, keep the peace and act justly,” she said.

    “Some of us have been unjustly singled out, harassed, persecuted and had our livelihoods stripped away because we dared to encourage conversation, asked questions, and refused to go along with the mob.”

    Read more from Sky News entertainment:
    Taylor Swift threatens to sue student who tracks her jets

    Love Island star subjected to ‘vile threats’ online

    Carano also said she was “honoured” to have the support of Tesla chief executive Musk, who first contacted her on X.

    “As a sign of X Corp’s commitment to free speech, the online platform is proud to provide financial support for Carano’s lawsuit, empowering her to seek vindication of her free speech rights on X and the ability to work without bullying, harassment, or discrimination,” a statement from the company said.

    Sky News has contacted Disney and LucasFilm for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gina Carano sues Disney and Lucasfilm over The Mandalorian firing in lawsuit financed by Elon Musk

    Gina Carano sues Disney and Lucasfilm over The Mandalorian firing in lawsuit financed by Elon Musk

    [ad_1]

    Gina Carano is suing Disney and Lucasfilm for discrimination and wrongful termination with the help of Elon Musk and X.

    The 41-year-old actor and former MMA fighter was fired from the Disney+ Star Wars spin-off series The Mandalorian in February 2021 after she shared a social media post comparing the Republican experience in the US to that of Jewish people during the Holocaust.

    Carano played the special forces warrior character Cara Dune opposite Pedro Pascal’s titular Mandalorian.

    On Tuesday (6 February), Carano filed a complaint in California federal court accusing the entertainment companies of damaging her reputation and discriminating based on her gender.

    The Independent has contacted Disney and Lucasfilm for comment.

    “A short time ago in a galaxy not so far away, Defendants made it clear that only one orthodoxy in thought, speech, or action was acceptable in their empire, and that those who dared to question or failed to fully comply would not be tolerated,” the complaint, seen by The Independent, begins, with a nod to the Star Wars franchise’s language.

    Delivering on his 2023 promise to fund the legal bills of any user “unfairly treated” by an employer for their activity on X, Musk’s social media company is helping to foot Carano’s legal bill.

    Gina Carano in ‘The Mandalorian’

    (Lucasfilm)

    She is seeking a court order that would force Lucasfilm to recast her and at least $75,000, plus punitive damages.

    “In addition to terminating her, Defendants refused to hire her for roles already promised, including but not limited to Season 3 of The Mandalorian, the new series Rangers of the New Republic, and planned future Stars Wars full length feature films (which have recently been announced) – all because of her political beliefs and in disparate treatment from her male co-workers,” the complaint asserts.

    “Defendants also discriminated against Carano by treating her differently from her male co-stars who also made public, political statements on social media,” her suit says. “Her male co-stars were not disciplined, let alone terminated in a way to destroy their careers even though some would find their statements ‘abhorrent.’”

    Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video

    Sign up now for a 30-day free trial

    Sign up

    Access unlimited streaming of movies and TV shows with Amazon Prime Video

    Sign up now for a 30-day free trial

    Sign up

    At the time, Carano referenced a now-deleted tweet in which Pascal compared supporters of Donald Trump to Nazis.

    In a statement issued on Tuesday, Carano added: “Some of us have been unjustly singled out, harassed, persecuted and had our livelihoods stripped away because we dared to encourage conversation, asked questions, and refused to go along with the mob.”

    (Getty Images)

    On X funding the suit, she said: “I am honored that my case has been chosen to be supported by the company that has been one of the last glimmers of hope for free speech in the world.”

    In a statement of its own, X’s head of business operations Joe Benarroch said: “As a sign of X Corp’s commitment to free speech, we’re proud to provide financial support for Gina Carano’s lawsuit, empowering her to seek vindication of her free speech rights on X and the ability to work without bullying, harassment, or discrimination.”

    Disney’s decision to remove Carano from The Mandalorian was welcomed by many fans at the time who had previously campaigned for Carano’s dismissal due to her history of sharing controversial tweets.

    In its 2021 statement, LucasFilm described Carnano’s social media activity as “abhorrent and unacceptable”.

    Carano later spoke out in an interview with right-leaning website The Daily Wire, where she said that she felt she had been “head-hunted” by Disney because she “wasn’t going along with the narrative”.

    “I was prepared at any point to be let go, because I’ve seen this happen to so many people. They don’t get to make people feel like that … and if I buckle, it’ll make it okay for these companies, who have a history of lying, to be lying and to do this to other people … and I’m not going down without a fight.”

    Following the news, fans of Carano called for a boycott of Disney’s streaming service using the hashtag #CancelDisneyPlus. However, the request was largely mocked online.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gina Carano Files Lawsuit With Elon Musk’s Help Against Disney and Lucasfilm Over ‘The Mandalorian’ Firing

    Gina Carano Files Lawsuit With Elon Musk’s Help Against Disney and Lucasfilm Over ‘The Mandalorian’ Firing

    [ad_1]

    Gina Carano has filed a lawsuit against Disney and Lucasfilm over her firing from The Mandalorian, and she’s being backed by X CEO Elon Musk.

    According to court documents obtained by ET, Carano claims she was targeted, harassed, publicly humiliated, defamed and ultimately fired from her role in the Star Wars TV series because she made political statements on X that “did not align with what they believed was an acceptable viewpoint.”

    Carano went on to claim that she was discriminated because Disney and Lucasfilm targeted her differently from her male co-stars “who also made public, political statements on social media.” She claims those male co-stars were “not disciplined, let alone terminated.” Carano, who played Cara Dune, was fired in February 2021. She was later dropped by her talent agency, UTA.

    Specifically, Carano brought up her former co-star, Pedro Pascal, whom she claimed took to Instagram on Aug. 16, 2017 and compared then-President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler. For that and other alleged instances, Carano claims Disney and Lucasfilm “did not comment on, let alone condemn Pascal’s social media comments.”

    ET has reached out to Disney and Lucasfilm for comment.

    One day prior to her firing, Carano shared two controversial political posts to social media that generated swift backlash among fans. In one post, Carano compared the divided American political climate to Nazi Germany, with remarks likening conservative Republicans to Jewish people being targeted for their beliefs.

    “Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…even by children. Because history is edited, most people today don’t realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?” stated Carano’s post, which was a screenshot of someone else’s Instagram post. 

    Disney+

    Carano also shared a meme featuring an image of a person’s face covered in masks that mocked California’s coronavirus pandemic-related mask mandates.

    Following her February 2021 firing, a Lucasfilm spokesperson told ET, “Gina Carano is not currently employed by Lucasfilm and there are no plans for her to be in the future. Nevertheless, her social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural and religious identities are abhorrent and unacceptable.”

    Carano claims the defendants “made it known they did not agree with or approve of [her] political views on the Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates.” She claims “another source of constant harassment was the demands that she put pronouns in her profile.”

    In response to this “bullying” from those on social media, Carano says in court documents that she “put three simple words in her Twitter profile, a reference to sounds a droid would make, ‘boop/bop/beep,’” which she deleted a short time later.

    In deleting the post, Carano explained in a Sept. 12, 2020 tweet, “Yes, Pedro & I spoke & he helped me understand why people were putting them in their bios. I didn’t know before but I do now. I won’t be putting them in my bio but good for all you who choose to. I stand against bullying, especially the most vulnerable & freedom to choose.”

    Carano claims that tweet brought forward more harassment and bullying, simply because “I won’t put my pronouns in my bio to show my support for trans lives.” She added in the tweet, “After months of harassing me in every way, I decided to put 3 VERY controversial words in my bio..beep/bop/boop. I’m not against trans lives at all. They need to find less abusive representation.”

    After a series of tweets in which she sought to explain her position on pronouns in bios, Carano claims she made “yet another attempt to counter the claims of her being ‘transphobic’” with a post in which she reiterated that “Beep/bop/boop has zero to do with mocking trans people [and everything] to do with exposing the bullying mentality of the mob that has taken over the voices of many genuine causes.” She added the hashtag “AllLoveNoHate.”

    In response to all of these tweets, Carano claims Disney and Lucasfilm “were not satisfied” and they “subjected [her] to long phone calls demanding an explanation and criticizing her for not embracing what some see was mandatory solidarity with a vocal element of the transgender activist community.”

    She claims she was forced to enter a “re-education” program and required to meet with members of GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Discrimination), “something she willingly did,” she claims. Following a 90-minute Zoom meeting with GLAAD, she claims GLAAD reps “provided positive feedback” to Disney and Lucasfilm, but the defendants “continued to demand a public apology.”

    Carano claims in court documents that the defendants “went so far as to try and convince [her] publicist to force [her] to issue a statement admitting to mocking or insulting an entire group of people, which [she] had never done.”

    The actress claims she was then told she’d be required to participate in a Zoom call with Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy and 45 employees who identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, “going as far as to say that her willingness to endure such harassment and humiliation was a ‘litmus test’ for her.”

    Carano claims she declined to take part in the Zoom call but offered to take “5 or 6 to dinner so they could talk face-to-face” but the “defendants refused the offer.” 

    Getty

    Carano is suing for discrimination, wrongful termination and for Lucasfilm to recast her. In a lengthy tweet announcing the lawsuit, Carano said she filed the lawsuit because she “was being hunted down from everything I posted to every post I liked because I was not in line with the acceptable narrative of the time.”

    In that same tweet, Carano explained that she replied to a Musk tweet in which he said he would fund legal representation to anyone who had been fired for expressing their views on his platform.

    “To my surprise, a few months ago I received an email from a lawyer who had been hired by X to look into my story & many others,” Carano continued in her tweet. “Turns out after sending them as much information as I could gather these past few months, my now lawyers & X believe whole-heartedly in my case & are moving forward.”

    Less than an hour after Carano announced the lawsuit on X, Musk subtweeted, saying, “Please let us know if you would like to join the lawsuit against Disney.”

    Carano’s attorney, Gene Schaerr, said in a press release that “Disney bullied Ms. Carano, trying to force her to conform to their views about cultural and political issues, and when that bullying failed, they fired her.” He added, “Punishing employees for their speech on political or social issues is illegal under California law.”

    RELATED CONTENT:



    [ad_2]

    Source link