Attorneys for Donald Trump and federal prosecutors submitted hypothetical jury instructions in the former president’s classified documents case late Tuesday, with special counsel Jack Smith also delivering a scathing rebuke of the presiding judge’s order requesting them.  U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon last month ordered both parties to draft and file hypothetical jury instructions drawing from competing interpretations of two laws related to the case, a request legal experts have said is unusual, The Washington Post reports.  In his team’s filing, Smith rebuffed the judge, arguing that the jury instructions were based on a “fundamentally flawed legal premise.” He asked the Trump-appointee to “promptly” decide whether the “unstated legal premise” undergirding her order represents the court’s view of a “correct formulation of the law,” warning that he may appeal if the court finds “wrongly” that it does. Though Smith’s response to Cannon’s recent order was “forceful,” it was “appropriate,” former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Salon. “Judge Cannon is wrong on the law. She’s consistently wrong on the law and . . . she has entertained …