The overlooked philosophy that could shed light on reality’s deepest mysteries
Sign up for the Smarter Faster newsletter A weekly newsletter featuring the biggest ideas from the smartest people Notice: JavaScript is required for this content. Over the past few decades, some scientists have claimed that science does not need philosophy. Usually, the next statement out of their mouths is one rich with philosophical assumptions they’re not even aware of. It’s kind of sad. Fortunately, there are lots of great examples of scientists and philosophers engaging in rich and fruitful dialogues. As a physicist with a longstanding interest in philosophy, I’m happy these discussions are happening. Still, I think something significant is missing, and I’d like to drag that absence out into the light. When we talk about the “philosophy of science” or even “philosophy and science,” the conversations are generally monotone. What I mean by this is that the philosophies represented in the discussions come from a narrow part of the world’s heritage of philosophical inquiry. I think this must change if we want answers to key scientific questions: the nature of time, quantum mechanics, …