A recent documentary has reignited public interest in the tragic story of Gabby Petito, a young woman whose life was cut short in a highly publicized domestic violence case. The documentary detailing her case has sparked national conversation, with many questioning how law enforcement could have intervened more effectively to prevent her death.
The legal system often overlooks red flags of Intimate Partner Violence
The documentary sheds light on some critical flaws within the judicial system regarding intimate partner violence, particularly in areas of the legal system’s handling of abuse and coercive control. Unfortunately, this is a conversation that many in the survivor community have been having for years, as research has consistently shown the inconsistencies and failures of law enforcement to act and protect victims in need1,2.
Gabby Petito’s case began as a missing person investigation after she vanished while traveling with her fiancé, Brian Laundrie. In the months leading up to her disappearance, their relationship showed evidence of emotional and physical abuse.
The most significant red flag came when police in Moab, Utah, responded to a domestic violence call in the summer of 2021. Officers separated Gabby and Brian, with Gabby appearing visibly distressed, and police can be overheard joking around with Brian. This interaction represents a key example of the judicial system’s failure to address IPV adequately due to often not taking it seriously.
As a clinician who works with survivors, I hear every day about the ways that IPV, specifically in areas of coercive control, are overlooked by the legal system. As a survivor, I remember begging and pleading with law enforcement to take my experiences of stalking and threats seriously. As mine was an issue of post-separation abuse, the judicial system dismissed it as “normal breakup stuff” until the situation turned violent. Had law enforcement taken me seriously, perhaps it would not have gotten that bad.
The documentary has reignited interest and public awareness
Many IPV experts agree that separating the couple without further intervention may have sent a message that the abuse was not serious enough to warrant arrest or a more thorough investigation. This is common with IPV cases, where domestic abuse is often dismissed as a minor dispute, and something that law enforcement does not have time to deal with. Abusive dynamics often involve manipulation, control, and coercion, making it difficult for victims to leave or seek help. The judicial system’s failure to understand these elements of IPV often results in missed opportunities to protect victims before it’s too late.
The Gabby Petito documentary, and the broader media coverage of her case, has contributed to raising awareness about the need for reform in how IPV cases are handled by the judicial system. Reignited public interest is bringing to light the systemic issues of underreporting, lack of training, and insufficient resources available for law enforcement officers to effectively handle IPV cases, leading to insufficient protection for victims1,2.
A wake-up call: What can be done?
Gabby’s case is a stark illustration of how IPV can be downplayed by the very institutions designed to protect victims. The legal system’s lack of understanding of IPV, as well as its failure to take swift action, can have dangerous consequences for victims1,2.
This documentary highlights several areas where the judicial system could improve:
First, police officers and first responders need better training in recognizing the warning signs of IPV, which may not always involve physical violence. Many experts advocate for more domestic violence training that focuses on the power dynamics present in abusive relationships3.
Another proposed change is a shift in how law enforcement treats IPV cases. Rather than treating it as a private or minor issue, advocates also call for stronger protective orders and the establishment of stronger legal protections for victims of IPV.
Additionally, society needs more accessible support systems in place for victims of IPV. Improving access and availability of shelters, legal aid, and other forms of support can make a huge difference in the safety and security of IPV victims, who often feel trapped in abusive situations.
If you are looking for support to work through your trauma history or to break the cycle of abuse, seek the support of a therapist who can help.
Domestic Violence Essential Reads
If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic abuse, call 800.799.SAFE (7233) or visit thehotline.org.
To find a therapist, visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory.